• Work Overview
  • About
  • Testimonials
  • On The Record
  • Linkedin

Vicky Beercock

Creative Brand Communications and Marketing Leader | Driving Cultural Relevance & Meaningful Impact | Collaborations

  • Work Overview
  • About
  • Testimonials
  • On The Record
  • Linkedin

A Homage To Brian Wilson: The Sonic Architect Who Rewired American Culture

Brian Wilson wasn’t just a genius. He was a disruptor, a quiet revolutionary who remade pop music from the inside out. His passing at 82 closes a chapter on one of the most profound cultural legacies of the 20th century, and his fingerprints are still all over the sound of today.

Before Brian Wilson, pop was catchy. After Brian Wilson, pop was cathedral. He took the California dream - surfing, convertibles, golden-hour innocence - and turned it into a widescreen, Technicolor sound that reshaped how America saw itself. He didn’t just soundtrack the sixties. He mythologised it, then deconstructed it. And when the illusion cracked, he gave us music that looked straight into the void and still somehow offered grace.

Wilson’s Beach Boys weren’t just hitmakers. They were cultural architects. "Pet Sounds" didn’t just inspire Sgt. Pepper. It provoked it. The Beatles weren’t competing with anyone except Brian. Paul McCartney has called “God Only Knows” the greatest song ever written. That’s not a compliment. That’s acknowledgment of Wilson as a generational force, someone whose instincts changed the very vocabulary of pop.

He bent the studio to his will long before that was even a concept. Long before hip-hop producers were layering samples or indie bands were chasing lo-fi transcendence, Brian was wiring harpsichords, dogs barking, and bicycle bells into heartbreak anthems. He built songs like film scores. “Good Vibrations” wasn’t a single. It was a six-month sonic experiment that accidentally became a number one hit. He made emotion into architecture.

And his influence wasn’t just musical. It was spiritual. Wilson cracked open the pop star archetype. He was a frontman who didn’t tour, a genius who couldn’t always function, a legend who often didn’t want the spotlight. He showed the cost of genius and the beauty in vulnerability. He was decades ahead of the conversation on mental health and the toll of fame. In a world now obsessed with authenticity, Wilson was the original unfiltered soul.

You can hear his echo everywhere. In the rich melancholy of Frank Ocean. In the layered optimism of Vampire Weekend. In the cinematic reach of Tame Impala. Every artist trying to push pop past its limits owes something to Wilson’s experiments, whether they know it or not.

His life was complicated. His journey was brutal. But he came through it all still chasing beauty. Still trying to tune into something divine. That’s what made him matter. Not just the hits. Not just the accolades. But the risk. The fact that he never stopped searching for something pure in a world that wasn’t.

Brian Wilson didn’t just change music. He changed what music could mean. And for that, he’ll always be more than a Beach Boy. He’ll be a blueprint.

God only knows what we’d be without him. But thankfully, we’ll never have to find out.

tags: music
categories: Music, Culture, Impact
Wednesday 06.11.25
Posted by Vicky Beercock
 

Navigating Cultural Influence and Free Expression: The Kneecap Controversy and the Role of Industry Leadership

As the 2025 festival season unfolds, one question captures attention in the music world: Will Irish rap group Kneecap perform at Glastonbury as planned? And if so, will the BBC stream their set as in previous years, or will external pressures impact their visibility?

This situation offers a valuable lens on how culture, politics, and industry power intersect - and raises important questions about transparency, influence, and artistic freedom.

Behind Closed Doors: The Private Campaign

Recently revealed correspondence shows a confidential letter sent to Glastonbury organisers by a coalition of senior industry insiders. The letter expressed concerns that Kneecap’s politically charged lyrics could be construed as “propagating hate,” suggesting that their appearance might conflict with commitments to “free speech.”

Those involved are not marginal figures; they represent major agencies, record labels, and organisations with influence across the global entertainment sector. Their participation in this private effort highlights how internal industry mechanisms can shape public cultural spaces - often without scrutiny or accountability.

The Challenge of Private Influence

What stands out is the private, non-transparent nature of this intervention. Rather than a public discussion or open dialogue, the letter functioned as a discreet warning - an attempt to influence decisions away from public scrutiny.

This pattern is not isolated to music; similar private pressures have been reported within fashion and other cultural sectors, reflecting a broader trend of behind-the-scenes lobbying that risks limiting diverse voices without accountability.

Ethical Reflections on Industry Leadership

The entertainment industry rightly prides itself on promoting inclusivity and combating discrimination. However, when leaders in this space engage in efforts to restrict political expression - particularly on complex issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - it raises important questions about the boundaries of institutional anti-racism.

The attempt to silence an Irish group critical of ongoing conflict in Gaza - especially amid a growing public demand for honest political engagement - risks alienating younger artists and audiences who expect cultural platforms to support open discourse.

What’s at Stake for Festivals and Broadcasters?

Glastonbury faces a critical choice: to uphold its reputation as a space for bold, diverse artistic voices, or to yield to pressures that may stifle important cultural conversations. Similarly, the BBC’s decision on streaming Kneecap’s set will be a key indicator of its commitment to editorial independence.

Should mainstream platforms step back, independent channels and artists may need to take up the mantle - ensuring that cultural spaces remain accessible to varied perspectives, even when those perspectives challenge prevailing narratives.

Conclusion: Towards a Culture of Openness and Accountability

The Kneecap controversy highlights broader tensions around political expression, cultural influence, and the responsibilities of industry leaders. As the arts continue to engage with pressing global issues, transparency and accountability must guide how decisions are made.

Balancing respect for diverse viewpoints with a commitment to free expression is no easy task - but it is essential for nurturing a vibrant, inclusive cultural landscape.

tags: music
categories: Music, Impact
Wednesday 06.11.25
Posted by Vicky Beercock
 

SXSW London: A Missed Opportunity That Must Do Better Next Time

Plenty of people have been asking: does the UK really need SXSW London? One comment I came across recently summed it up bluntly - why pay £1,560 for a delegate pass when we already have a thriving ecosystem of homegrown showcase events like The Great Escape, Sound City, FOCUS Wales, Wide Days, ILMC, Chris Carey’s FFWD, and the important work being done by Dr. Yasin El Ashrafi in Leicester?

That stuck with me, and I have to say - I didn’t attend SXSW London. Not because I didn’t want to be curious, but because I genuinely didn’t feel the offering justified the price or the time investment. And based on the programming, reviews, speaker lineups, social media feedback, and media coverage I’ve since seen, I’m confident I made the right call.

Safe, Sanitised, and Superficial

The programming, on paper, felt like it was built for browsing, not building. Most sessions were short - around 30 minutes - with overstuffed panels and no room for actual dialogue. The tone seemed more suited to a stream of corporate keynotes than a space for meaningful cultural exchange. In an era where creative industries are under immense pressure, SXSW London missed an opportunity to go deep, take risks, and speak to the realities of the moment.

Uninspired and Over-Engineered

From what I’ve seen and read, the speaker lineup lacked edge. The event seemed to play it safe - choosing recognisable, brand-friendly names over people actually moving the needle creatively. The result? Sessions that read like a LinkedIn feed brought to life: polished, shallow, and largely forgettable.

Politics Over People

One of the most talked-about aspects was the unannounced appearance of Tony Blair and David Cameron. That decision prompted backlash and led to some artists withdrawing in protest. The term “artwashing” was used for good reason - injecting politics without transparency felt misjudged and undermined any sense of community trust or cultural authenticity.

Branded Vibes, Not Cultural Pulse

Visually, the event looked slick - but many attendees commented that it felt like a branded trade show rather than a genuine celebration of culture. It leaned heavily into commercial polish, yet struggled to capture real creative energy. Even the freebies - like mini branded speakers - felt symbolic of the disconnect between branding and value.

The Elephant in the Room: The Price Point

Let’s not ignore this: £1,560 for a delegate pass is not just steep, it’s exclusionary. Especially when freelancers, small organisations, and emerging artists are already stretched. Multiple people have pointed out how unsustainable this is. I wouldn’t be surprised if next year sees an influx of complimentary passes just to get the right crowd in the room.

What SXSW London Needs To Do Next Time

  1. Earn the Right to Be Here
    Engage with the creative communities already thriving across the UK. Don’t impose - collaborate.

  2. Lower the Price Point - Dramatically
    If you claim to value accessibility, make it real. This isn’t Silicon Valley.

  3. Rebuild Credibility
    Avoid political PR stunts. Prioritise integrity and transparency.

  4. Create Space for Real Dialogue
    Slow the format down. Allow time for meaningful conversation, not just soundbites.

  5. Centre UK Creativity
    SXSW London has to reflect UK-specific voices, challenges, and strengths. Otherwise, it’s just SXSW-lite.

Bottom line: Even from a distance, the debut of SXSW London seemed to miss its moment. There’s no denying the infrastructure was solid, but the substance felt hollow. If it’s going to earn its place in the UK’s cultural landscape, it needs to be rethought from the ground up - with humility, fairness, and a genuine commitment to the creative communities it claims to serve.

Until then, we already have better options.

tags: music
categories: Tech, Sport, Music, Impact, Fashion, Culture, Beauty
Tuesday 06.10.25
Posted by Vicky Beercock
 

$8 Billion Spent on Global Cultural Projects in 2023: Key Takeaways from the Cultural Infrastructure Index

1st July 2024

2023 Cultural Infrastructure Index: Key Takeaways from $8 Billion in Global Projects

In 2023, over $8 billion worth of cultural projects were built globally. Here are 7 key takeaways from the 2023 Cultural Infrastructure Index:

  1. Renovation and Adaptation: Renovation and adaptation have gained popularity as a response to sustainability concerns and budget tightening.

  2. Museums and Galleries: Museums and galleries continue to be the leading types of cultural buildings.

  3. Immersive Experiences: Immersive experiences remain a significant draw for audiences, indicating the growing demand for interactive and engaging cultural content.

  4. Decline in Physical Size: The physical size of cultural projects has dropped by a third, highlighting a shift in focus to more compact, sustainable designs.

  5. Activity Beyond Major Culture Centres: Cultural activity has expanded outside the traditional major cultural hubs, indicating a more global distribution of cultural infrastructure.

  6. Snøhetta: The architectural firm Snøhetta is leading among thriving architectural practices, with significant contributions to cultural projects.

  7. Perelman Performing Arts Center: The Perelman Performing Arts Center stands out as the top project by value, solidifying its place in high-profile cultural infrastructure development.

To dive deeper, you can read more here:
2023 Cultural Infrastructure Index.

tags: arts, culture, music
categories: Culture, Music
Monday 07.01.24
Posted by Vicky Beercock