🏆 UEFA Women’s EURO 2025 Breaks Records: Why Player Power and Cultural Relevance Are Reshaping the Game

In a rematch of the 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup final, England defeated Spain to win the UEFA Women’s EURO 2025 in Switzerland. But beyond the final result, this year’s tournament signalled a shift in scale, attention and cultural value - across attendance, digital engagement, athlete influence and brand performance.

The women’s game has moved from breakthrough to benchmark.

📊 Tournament Performance Snapshot

• 657,291 total fans attended across 31 matches (29 sold out)

• 34,203 fans attended the final in Basel

• 35% of attendees travelled internationally, representing 160+ nationalities

• Swiss host cities reported a 12% visitor increase and 27% spending growth

• 500M+ global viewers engaged with the tournament (projected)

• The final is expected to surpass 45M streams globally

• UEFA’s app and website saw over 49M views, with 20.7M+ social engagements

• 95K+ fans joined organised fan walks; 1M+ engaged in fan zones

🌟 Player Power: Michelle Agyemang and the Youth Surge

• Michelle Agyemang, 18, became a breakout star and Young Player of the Tournament

• She scored stoppage-time goals in both the quarter-final and semi-final, despite playing just 138 minutes

• Her personal story - from Wembley ball girl to national hero - trended across major platforms and inspired high-volume, high-sentiment content

• Other emerging stars like Iman Beney, Vicky López, and Smilla Vallotto also gained sharp follower growth and commercial attention

• Player-led content outperformed official or sponsor-led creative across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube Shorts

📣 Brand Share of Voice & Engagement (Campaigns That Cut Through)

The brands that succeeded at EURO 2025 didn’t just sponsor - they participated in culture, activated quickly, and let players lead.

🏁 Nike - 11OME & the Journey Home

• Nike led the post-final moment with “It’s not just coming home. It’s 11OME.”, deployed across OOH, social and live activations.

• Featured arrival content, fan installations and cultural commentary.

• Delivered a 35% spike in Instagram engagement on @nikefootball during finals week, with 4.2M+ views on the hero video in 48 hours.

🔥 Adidas - Icons of the Future, Aygemergency & Star Power

• Adidas’s Icons of the Future featured Alessia Russo, Aitana Bonmatí, Michelle Agyemang and Vicky López - blending performance footage with off-pitch storytelling.

• Their reactive “Break in Case of Aygemergency” stunt went viral after Agyemang’s second clutch goal:

  • Store displays, TikTok assets and GIF packs generated 2.5M+ video uses in 48 hours

  • Agyemang’s follower count surpassed 1M during the campaign window

• Adidas led earned share of voice among sponsors from quarter-finals through to the final (source: Talkwalker).

💳 Visa - Fans Without Borders

• A docuseries highlighting fan journeys across Europe drew 12M+ views and lifted brand favourability by 11% in UEFA-related social media conversations.

🎧 Spotify - Player Soundtracks

• Spotify's curated playlists featured players like Russo and Batlle, generating 400K+ streams and strong organic shares via athlete profiles.

💄 L'Oréal - Game Face

• TikTok-first beauty content featuring Iman Beney and Selma Bacha became the most engaged branded beauty content during the tournament.

🚗 Volkswagen - Penalty Challenge Fan Zones

• VW’s interactive zones drew 18,000+ participants, with 120K+ UGC moments feeding directly into UEFA’s official channels.

👀 How It Compares: Men’s & Women’s Benchmarks

To frame the scale of EURO 2025:

• The FIFA Club World Cup Final 2023 drew 81,118 attendees and ~107M viewers - less than EURO 2025's combined reach

• A 2025 men’s pre-season friendly (Man Utd vs West Ham) drew 82,566 - the biggest US football crowd of the year, but with limited global broadcast impact

• The UEFA Women’s EURO 2022 had 574,875 attendees and 365M viewers - both surpassed this year

• The FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023 reached over 2B viewers, with ~2M attending in person

• The UEFA Women’s Champions League Final 2025 (Arsenal vs Barcelona) drew 38,356 and 3.6M viewers

• By comparison, the FIFA Men’s World Cup Final 2022 drew 88,966 in-stadium and 1.5B peak global viewers

• The UEFA Men’s EURO 2020 reached 5.2B total audience, with 328M for the final

📌 Key Takeouts

• UEFA Women’s EURO 2025 broke all previous records across attendance, engagement, and economic impact

• Player-led narratives drove the tournament’s reach, especially among younger and digital-first audiences

• Nike owned the post-final moment, but Adidas’s real-time cultural play and player focus captured early share of voice

• Digital-first, culturally fluent brands like Spotify and L'Oréal delivered standout performance through relevance over reach

• Women’s football is no longer emerging - it’s defining what successful sports marketing looks like in 2025

🔮 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Get closer to athletes, not just federations - player-driven content is now the primary mode of influence

• Plan for culture, not just coverage - campaigns must be reactive, meme-literate and mobile-native

• Treat women’s football as primary commercial territory - not CSR or secondary inventory

• Use live experiences to feed digital storytelling - not just as standalone stunts

• Track ROI by share of voice and cultural impact, not just legacy prestige

UEFA Women’s EURO 2025 wasn’t just a tournament. It was a live demonstration of where fan energy, brand value, and cultural influence are moving next.

The players are ready. The fans are watching. And the smartest brands are already on the pitch.

🎵 Payback Time: UK Songwriters Secure Per Diems in Landmark Label Agreement

A quiet revolution is happening in the music industry - and this time, it's songwriters leading the charge. In what’s being described as a world-first agreement, UK songwriters will now receive £75 per diem plus expenses when attending label-organised writing sessions with the UK's major record labels. Even more significantly, these payments will be non-recoupable.

Why This Matters Now

For decades, songwriters have been the unsung heroes of the music business - crafting chart-topping hits while often working without upfront pay, basic subsistence, or guaranteed income. In the streaming era, where song royalties are split disproportionately, their position has become even more precarious.

This new agreement marks a major shift in how the industry recognises creative labour. Spearheaded by The Ivors Academy, the deal signals a growing momentum behind fairness and financial transparency in music creation.

The Pros - Why This Is a Win

• Direct support for creative labour: A per diem system, common in film and other production industries, finally acknowledges that creative time has real cost and value.

• Non-recoupable status: Unlike advances, these payments won’t be clawed back from future royalties - a crucial win for fair compensation.

• Industry precedent: This is reportedly the first such agreement in the world, setting a new benchmark for other markets and genres.

According to Music Business Worldwide, the initiative was secured through sustained campaigning by songwriter members and advocacy by The Ivors Academy, one of the UK’s leading music rights organisations.

The Cons - What’s Still Lacking

• Limited scope: At present, the deal only applies to sessions organised by the UK’s three major labels (Universal, Sony, Warner). Independent songwriters or those working outside label frameworks are still without coverage.

• No fix for streaming: While the per diem offers short-term relief, it doesn’t address the broader structural inequity in streaming revenues, where songwriters often earn far less than performers or labels.

Opportunities - A Door Opens for Broader Reform

• Setting global standards: This model could be replicated in other countries or by independent labels and publishers.

• Shifting the power dynamic: By recognising songwriters as workers entitled to fair conditions, the agreement may catalyse wider industry reforms - from session fees to royalty splits.

• Brand partnerships with values: For agencies and brands working in music, supporting artists and writers with fair pay has become an increasingly important reputational issue.

Challenges - What's in the Way?

• Implementation logistics: Claims will initially be processed via a temporary system through The Ivors Academy, with a new form in development. Ensuring smooth and consistent payment will be key.

• Keeping the pressure on: Without continued visibility and union-like organising, such gains can stagnate or be undermined in the long term.

Key Takeouts

• UK major labels will now provide £75 per diem plus expenses to songwriters for writing sessions.

• This is a non-recoupable payment - a landmark development.

• The agreement was secured by The Ivors Academy and its members.

• It sets a global precedent, though broader systemic issues in streaming remain unresolved.

Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Watch how value is shifting: Creators are increasingly organising for fairer conditions. Brands working in music should ensure they’re on the right side of that shift.

• Consider how you fund creative work: Are freelance writers, composers or designers in your campaigns being treated with the same principles?

• Support fair culture: If your brand is using music as a marketing vehicle, showing active support for songwriter rights can demonstrate real cultural fluency.

🎶 TikTok Turns Up the Volume on Songwriters: What the New Features Mean for Brands and Creators

As TikTok continues to shape global music discovery, its latest move puts songwriters centre stage. With the beta launch of TikTok Songwriter Features, the platform is responding to industry calls for greater transparency, visibility and value for the creators behind the hits. For brands, talent managers, and cultural strategists, this development signals a shift in how music creators can be engaged and elevated in the social ecosystem.

Why This Matters Now

TikTok has become a core driver of music virality. But until now, songwriters have often remained in the background. This new suite of features - including a Songwriter Account Label and a Music Tab - is designed to ensure their work is properly credited and more discoverable.

According to MIDiA Research’s 2025 Songwriter Report, 53% of full-time songwriters who post content do so on TikTok, and over 80% of all songwriters use social media to advance their careers. The timing is clear: songwriter visibility is no longer optional - it’s business-critical.

✅ Pros - What’s Working?

Elevated Attribution
For the first time, songwriters can label their profiles and curate a music tab showcasing their co-written works, making authorship transparent and accessible.

Content + Catalogue Integration
TikTok’s update places music and storytelling side by side - empowering songwriters to link personal content with professional catalogues.

Direct Fan Discovery
As songwriter KOLE notes, fans are discovering creators through TikTok’s algorithmic curation - not by search. That passive discovery makes songwriter visibility more impactful than ever.

Industry Endorsement
Major publishers like Kobalt, Reservoir, Warner Chappell and Sentric have publicly backed the beta, reinforcing its industry legitimacy and reach.

❌ Cons - What Are the Limitations?

Closed Beta = Limited Access
Currently, the feature is in a restricted rollout with select publishing partners. This limits early visibility for independent or unsigned songwriters.

Attribution Is Still Optional
TikTok’s features are tools, not enforcement mechanisms. Unless widely adopted and standardised, songwriter credits may still be missed or inconsistent.

Monetisation Still Vague
While the features improve discovery, the connection to revenue (e.g. sync, streaming boosts, licensing) is still unclear for many songwriters.

💡 Opportunities - What Should Brands Pay Attention To?

Creator Collaborations at the Source
Brands can now identify not just performers, but the creative minds behind trending tracks - opening doors to deeper, story-led partnerships with writers.

Content Series Like #BehindTheSong
TikTok’s built-in storytelling formats like #BehindTheSong offer a blueprint for branded content collaborations focused on process, inspiration and authorship.

Talent Scouting Through Attribution
With credits attached to profiles, brands and agencies can scout songwriting talent based on real metrics - discoverability, influence, and song virality.

Culture-Led Campaign Soundtracking
Knowing who wrote a viral track opens up richer cultural alignment and licensing conversations, beyond performer endorsements.

⚠️ Challenges - What Barriers Exist?

Fragmented Credit Systems Across Platforms
TikTok may credit songwriters, but many DSPs and UGC platforms still lack consistent metadata frameworks.

Algorithmic Attention Gaps
TikTok’s For You Page surfaces content, not necessarily credit. Without amplification, songwriter features risk being underused or unseen.

Platform Dependency
Over-reliance on TikTok for visibility may reinforce platform-driven career models, which can be unstable or opaque.

🔑 Key Takeouts

• TikTok Songwriter Features signal a shift towards greater attribution and visibility for music creators.

• The initiative is backed by major publishers and supported by songwriter advocates across the industry.

• While still in beta, the features could reshape how songwriters are discovered, credited, and monetised on social platforms.

• Brand marketers now have a new layer of creative partnership potential, tracing culture back to its originators.

• Success will depend on widespread adoption, feature evolution, and cross-platform alignment on credit standards.

🧭 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Track the Beta Rollout: Stay informed on when the features open more broadly. Early engagement could offer brand partnership advantages.

• Map Songwriters to Cultural Trends: Go beyond performers. Identify the creatives behind trending TikTok tracks who may align with your brand story.

• Experiment with #BehindTheSong Formats: Use TikTok’s existing campaign structures to spotlight the creative journey behind licensed music in brand campaigns.

• Push for Metadata Standards: Join or support industry calls for consistent songwriter crediting across digital platforms.

• Reframe Influencer Strategy: Include songwriters as a new class of cultural creators for endorsement, partnership or amplification.

TikTok is positioning songwriters not just as background contributors, but as cultural figures in their own right. For brands, that means a chance to engage deeper in the music economy - at the source of creativity.

🧨 Fyre Festival Sale: What’s the Real Price of a Tarnished Brand?

🔥 Congratulations, You Bought a Fyre! (Now What?)
How a Disaster Festival Became the World’s Most Expensive Meme - and What Its New Owner Might Actually Do With It

Introduction
Remember Fyre Festival? That glittering influencer fantasy that turned into a slow-burn survival thriller shot entirely in Instagram aspect ratio? Well, it just sold on eBay. For $245,300.

Billy McFarland - the man who turned Evian water into a logistical crisis and cheese sandwiches into a class-action exhibit - auctioned off the rights to the Fyre brand. Yes, someone voluntarily paid nearly a quarter of a million dollars for a pile of broken promises, unkept NDAs, and a logo that smells faintly of damp plywood.

💥 How Bad Was It, Really?

Let’s recap, in case you’ve managed to forget the best-worst event of the last decade:

• Guests were promised private jets, luxury villas, and VIP yacht parties.

• They received hurricane-relief tents, feral dogs, and portaloos from a Mad Max reboot.

• Luggage was tossed out of shipping containers like bingo prizes.

• Gourmet catering turned out to be two slices of bread + one plastic cheese single = dinner.

• Thousands were stranded on an island with no electricity, no running water, and no explanation.

• The only thing that showed up reliably? The influencers’ phone batteries.

And let’s not forget the launch video, which broke the one (one!) rule of using the island: “Don’t mention Pablo Escobar.” They did. In the first five seconds. The sellers - allegedly ex-cartel associates - swiftly revoked their rental contract. Bad branding and potentially life-threatening. A bold mix.

🧐 So Who Bought It? And Why?

175 bids were placed, but the winner hasn’t been publicly named.

Given McFarland’s past with fake ticketing schemes, phantom VIP packages, and some suspiciously energetic Google Docs, we can’t rule out that he was bidding against himself... from the same IP address... using an alias like “NotBilly99”.

But whoever the buyer is, they now own one of the most recognisable (and ridiculed) event brands of all time. Which leads us to the question no one asked but we’re answering anyway:

🤹 What Can You Actually Do With the Fyre Festival Brand?

Here’s a spitball list of potential business ventures for the new owner, ranging from “sort of plausible” to “please don’t but we’d watch the doc”:

1. Fyre Fest: The Immersive Experience™
A travelling museum/pop-up that lets guests relive the disaster: wait 12 hours for luggage, queue for bread, try to find working WiFi. The exit is only open if you can prove you didn’t post a black square in 2017.

2. Limited-Edition Merch Drops
Streetwear that leans into the joke: “Booked. Cursed. Burned.” hoodies, FEMA tent duffel bags, or cheese sandwich air fresheners. Supreme would collab in a heartbeat.

3. A Netflix Prequel
Eight-part prestige drama: FYRE: Origins. Every episode opens with a drone shot and ends with a nervous phone call to Ja Rule.

4. Turn It Into a Branding Case Study IP
A keynote series or MBA module titled: The Limits of Influence: When Hashtags Outpace Infrastructure. Sponsored by Evian.

5. NFT resurrection (God help us all)
Repackage ticket stubs, digital merch, or “exclusive behind-the-scenes panic” as collectibles. Bonus points for minting a token called “FYRcoin.”

🧠 Key Takeouts

• The Fyre brand isn’t valuable because it worked - it’s valuable because it failed memorably.

• Infamy has cultural weight in the attention economy, especially when it spawns memes, docs, and group therapy sessions.

• Modern brand equity is just as much about narrative potential as product or performance.

• With enough irony and internet savviness, even a reputational dumpster fire can be monetised.

• If you're buying burnt IP, have a plan - and maybe legal representation.

So yes, someone really bought Fyre Festival. And no, we don’t know what they’ll do with it.

But if the history of this brand teaches us anything, it’s this: where there’s smoke... there’s probably a failed VIP concierge service.

Meanwhile, Billy McFarland - after serving four years in federal prison for fraud - still owes over $26 million in restitution, is banned from serving as a company director, and in 2025, attempted to launch Fyre Festival II. Tickets were reportedly being sold before a venue, date, or lineup was confirmed. Unsurprisingly, that plan also fizzled.

At which point, he did what any rational entrepreneur would do: listed the brand on eBay.

Honestly, it’s less of a business model and more of a performance art piece.

🔥 When Spectacle Backfires: What Tomorrowland’s Main Stage Fire Reveals About Festival Risk

The fire that destroyed Tomorrowland’s iconic main stage just 48 hours before the 2025 edition kicked off wasn’t just a production mishap - it was a cultural and operational alarm bell for large-scale events. For an experience famed for its hyper-immersive design, narrative staging, and theatrical build, the loss of its centrepiece so close to opening underscored the risks embedded in scale and spectacle.

Despite the dramatic setback, organisers confirmed the festival would go on as planned - a decision that reassures fans but invites reflection from brand strategists, cultural producers and live event professionals alike.

🎧 A Festival That Redefined Scale

Tomorrowland isn’t just another music festival. Held in Boom, Belgium, it attracts over 400,000 attendees annually, hosting more than 800 artists across two weekends. In 2023 alone, the event generated €155 million in economic impact for Flanders (Source: Tomorrowland Economic Report, 2023), with livestreams reaching millions more globally.

At the heart of this mega-production is the main stage - redesigned every year as an architectural and thematic statement. The now-destroyed Orbyz stage was themed around “a magical universe made entirely out of ice,” complete with pyrotechnics and elaborate animatronics. This level of production is Tomorrowland’s signature - and its differentiator.

🔥 When the Centrepiece Becomes the Liability

The fire, which began around 6 p.m. Wednesday and took over three hours to contain, raises significant questions about how health and safety is managed at events of this scale. Fireworks installed in the stage structure exploded during the blaze, according to the Rivierenland fire brigade, though thankfully no injuries were reported.

Had this occurred just 48 hours later during peak crowd density, the consequences could have been catastrophic. A sudden evacuation or fire-related chaos with 70,000+ attendees in front of the stage would have severely tested any safety plan, no matter how well designed.

Elaborate main stage production offers incredible brand and attendee value - but when that spectacle becomes the event’s centre of gravity, its failure can jeopardise the whole enterprise.

📚 Learnings and Strategic Implications

1. Spectacle can’t be the single point of failure
Culturally, Tomorrowland’s theatrical ambition has set the bar for immersive festivals. But operationally, the heavy reliance on one architectural centrepiece creates a major risk concentration. Multi-stage or decentralised concepts may provide more resilience.

2. Crisis response and transparency matter
Organisers’ swift communication and commitment to go forward with the event preserved trust. In a cultural landscape where reputation is fragile, proactive, transparent messaging helped contain the fallout.

3. Health and safety protocols must consider ‘what ifs’
Although no injuries occurred, the incident highlights the importance of pre-emptive risk planning around live fire, special effects, and structural hazards. Rehearsing scenarios where infrastructure fails can no longer be optional.

4. Design must meet disaster resilience
The pursuit of ever-more intricate stage designs needs to be matched with robust materials, fire suppression systems, and emergency exit planning. Visual storytelling should not compromise safety systems.

5. Brand experience depends on operational excellence
For brands activating at cultural events, it’s a reminder that the experience economy is tightly linked to infrastructure and logistics. A brand moment is only as strong as the scaffolding behind it.

📌 Key Takeouts

• Tomorrowland attracts 400,000+ attendees annually and generates €155M in regional economic impact.

• A fire destroyed the main stage days before opening, highlighting risks in large-scale immersive design.

• No injuries occurred, but fireworks within the stage ignited during the blaze.

• Organisers will continue the festival, but questions remain about centralised production risk.

• Health and safety planning must evolve to match the creative ambition of such events.

Tomorrowland's ability to continue in the face of setback speaks to the professionalism and preparedness of its team. But for the wider industry, it's a vivid reminder: in the experience economy, the show can go on - but only if it’s safe to begin with.

🎧⚽️ From Beats to Barça: How Spotify Turned a Shirt Sponsorship Into a Cultural Power Play

Spotify's front-of-shirt partnership with FC Barcelona has become one of sport's most ambitious and effective branding strategies in recent memory. As outlined in Daniel-Yaw Miller’s May 2025 piece for SportsVerse, “How Spotify Built Its FC Barcelona Sponsorship Into a Music-Fashion-Culture Goldmine,” the streaming giant has rewritten the playbook on how brands can activate cultural relevance through sport. By trading traditional logo exposure for timely, artist-led takeovers during global moments like El Clásico, Spotify isn’t just sponsoring football – it’s shaping the future of fan engagement across music, fashion, and sport.

In a rare, behind-the-scenes interview, Marc Hazan, Spotify’s global VP of marketing and partnerships, described this strategy as “hitting the zeitgeist” - and by all measures, it’s working.

🚀 Pros - What’s Working?

Cultural Synergy That Resonates
Spotify’s yearly El Clásico jersey takeovers - featuring artists like Drake, Rosalía, The Rolling Stones and most recently Travis Scott - blend the emotional pull of football with the cultural weight of global music icons. These collaborations transcend fandom, creating mass desirability and tapping into fashion, resale and hype culture.

Record-Breaking Merchandising
The Travis Scott x Cactus Jack x Barcelona jersey set a new benchmark for demand, reportedly reselling for over $2,200 on StockX within days of its release. Earlier drops, like the Barcelona x Rosalía jersey, have also held strong resale value, cementing these pieces as cultural artefacts, not just merchandise.

Innovative Brand Integration
Unlike passive logo placements, Spotify’s activation strategy includes curated matchday playlists by players like Jules Koundé and exclusive artist performances (such as Travis Scott’s first-ever Barcelona concert). These deepen brand affinity while delivering unique experiences to fans.

⚠️ Cons - What Are the Risks?

Lost Traditional Visibility
By removing its logo from the most visible moment of the football calendar - the El Clásico - Spotify forfeits billions of global impressions. This is a high-risk move in a media environment where visibility often equates to value.

Dependence on Artist Relevance
The impact of the partnership is tightly linked to the cultural capital of the artists involved. A misstep in artist selection or backlash around a collaborator could quickly turn a cultural win into a PR problem.

Exclusivity vs Accessibility
While exclusivity drives hype, it may alienate loyal fans unable to afford or access these high-ticket items. Balancing aspirational branding with broad fan inclusion remains a challenge.

🔍 Opportunities - Where Brands Should Pay Attention

The Rise of Football as Fashion
Football kits are no longer just for match days. As Daniel-Yaw Miller notes, they're now fashion items worn by non-fans for style and status. Brands in music, fashion and sport should be exploring how to enter this crossover space authentically.

Reimagining Sponsorship Models
Spotify’s approach redefines what a sports sponsorship can be. Rather than visibility alone, it focuses on cultural currency, storytelling and digital content. This signals a shift in how partnerships should be structured in the age of fandoms and niche culture.

Localisation Meets Globalisation
Artist-led jerseys tap into global pop culture, but Spotify is also leveraging local fan communities with intimate concerts and regional engagement. This hybrid model of global reach with local resonance is an emerging best practice.

🧱 Challenges - What's in the Way?

Maintaining Authenticity
As Hazan emphasised, “staying respectful and authentic to football culture” is key. Over-commercialisation or tone-deaf activations risk alienating hardcore fans and eroding credibility.

Saturation and Imitation
Now that Spotify’s success is evident, copycat models are inevitable. Brands must innovate beyond the initial idea and evolve their execution to maintain originality and impact.

Scalability Beyond Barcelona
The unique cultural cachet of FC Barcelona, combined with Spotify’s artist relationships, makes this model effective. But can it be replicated with other teams or in other sports? Not every partnership offers the same cultural access point.

📌 Key Takeouts

• Spotify’s Barcelona deal is redefining the role of sponsorships in culture.

• Artist-led jersey swaps create scarcity, hype and commercial returns.

• The strategy’s strength lies in merging music, fashion and football authentically.

• Risks include visibility trade-offs, artist controversies and pricing exclusivity.

• Cultural capital is the new media currency - and brands must invest accordingly.

🔮 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Rethink ROI: Move beyond impressions and CPMs - ask how your brand can influence culture through partnerships.

• Get Embedded: Work with cultural insiders - not just agencies - to ensure brand activations feel real, not reactive.

• Design for Desire: Co-create limited products that fans want, not just ones that tick brand boxes.

• Embrace Cross-Pollination: Consider how sport, music, fashion, gaming and nightlife intersect – and build at those crossroads.

• Plan for Longevity: Don’t chase virality. Build long-term partnerships that allow for evolving, layered storytelling over seasons.

Spotify’s FC Barcelona playbook isn’t just a win for the brand. It’s a signal to the industry: the next era of sponsorship will be led by those who dare to blend creativity, culture and commerce.

🎧 Why Gen Z Is Streaming Oasis - and What That Tells Us About Culture in 2025

In July 2025, Oasis returned to the stage after 16 years apart - and reignited far more than just their fanbase.

The numbers were instant and staggering:

• Oasis streams surged by over 400% in the UK and nearly 320% globally over their reunion weekend.

• They gained 16.6 million new listeners this year alone.

• And perhaps most significantly: Gen Z now accounts for over 50% of those new fans.

No new album. No modern marketing campaign. Just a band from the 90s re-entering culture with precision and force. So what’s really going on?

It’s Bigger Than Nostalgia

On the surface, this looks like a textbook nostalgia boom. But dig deeper, and it reveals something more strategic - and more culturally telling.

We’re in an era of infinite choice and limited connection. Music, like much of media, is increasingly hyper-personalised and algorithmically fed. While discovery has never been easier, shared experience has never been harder to find.

A 2024 Ipsos study found that only 1 in 5 Gen Z listeners regularly share new music preferences with their friends, compared to 3 in 5 in 2004. Everyone’s listening to something—but often, no one’s listening together.

That fragmentation has created a cultural vacuum. And legacy music is filling the gap.

The Emotional Pull of Legacy Acts

The rise of Oasis in 2025 is far from an isolated case. According to MRC Data, older songs now account for over 70% of music consumption in markets like the US. Vinyl sales are up 11% year-on-year in the UK. Legacy albums like Definitely Maybe and (What’s the Story) Morning Glory? continue to chart, bolstered by limited-edition pressings, pop-up merch stores, and festival placements.

And far from resisting the past, Gen Z is embracing it.

• A 2023 Deloitte Digital report found that 68% of Gen Z actively seek out music “from before their time.”

• Spotify Culture Next data shows they describe older tracks as “comforting,” “identity-forming,” and “shared.”

This isn’t nostalgia—it’s emotional utility.

Shared Culture Is the True Commodity

What Oasis represent in this moment is more than Britpop. They represent shared cultural memory in a landscape of digital disconnection.

In a streaming era where “niche” dominates, legacy acts offer scale, cohesion and shorthand. They stand for something recognisable, communal, and often familial. Whether it’s singing “Don’t Look Back in Anger” in a stadium or buying the same £30 Lidl x Oasis-inspired parka, people want common cultural ground - and legacy music is delivering it.

It’s why Google embedded Oasis Easter eggs in its search UX. It’s why bucket hat sales spiked 89% in the weeks leading up to their first 2025 gig. And it’s why brands from Adidas to Lidl didn’t just ride the wave - they helped shape it.

What It Means for Brand Marketers

There’s a powerful lesson here for anyone trying to build meaningful connections in a fragmented market:

• Relevance doesn’t always mean newness. It means resonance.

• Legacy can outperform novelty - if it’s reactivated in the right way.

• Cultural equity isn’t about time passed. It’s about emotional shorthand.

For Gen Z, music from the past isn’t old. It’s shared. And in a culture defined by endless choice, shared experience is more valuable than ever.

Key Takeouts

• Oasis gained 16.6M new listeners in 2025, with Gen Z making up over 50%

• 400%+ surge in UK streams shows explosive re-entry

• Nostalgia isn’t passive - it’s a strategic tool for emotional commerce

• Brands that activated around Oasis - like Lidl and Adidas - tapped into cultural cohesion, not just content

• The future of marketing isn’t just innovation. It’s reconnection

🎸 Black Sabbath's Final Bow Was a £140M Power Chord for Charity.

Here’s what happened when metal legends, cultural memory, and real purpose collided in Birmingham:

👇
✅ £140 million raised for three UK charities: Birmingham Children's Hospital, Cure Parkinson’s, and Acorns Children's Hospice.
✅ Thousands packed Villa Park to witness the final Sabbath moment - joined by Metallica, Slayer, and a wave of global fans.
✅ Ozzy Osbourne - seated on a gothic black throne crowned with a bat - delivered a dramatic farewell performance, gold cane in hand.
✅ Musical director Tom Morello (Rage Against The Machine) said it took over a year of planning - calling it “a labour of love.”

✅ Donations will fund:
- A giant aquarium and new cinema for young patients at Birmingham Children’s.
- Support for children’s palliative care amid rising demand at Acorns.
- Research and patient support at Cure Parkinson’s - a cause close to Ozzy, who revealed his diagnosis in 2020.

This was cultural legacy with purpose.

Even the loudest genres can deliver quiet power when mobilised for good.

Read more via BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-68843728

🗞️ For more cultural deep dives across music, sport, fashion and fandom, subscribe to On The Record: https://lnkd.in/eczFBS_4

🧹 Cleaning House: YouTube Tightens Rules on AI-Generated ‘Slop’ Content

YouTube’s crackdown on “inauthentic” content marks a strategic shift in the platform’s fight against low-effort, AI-generated media. As of 15 July, the company will update its YouTube Partner Program (YPP) monetisation policies, targeting mass-produced and repetitive content - much of it now made possible by generative AI tools.

For brand marketers, recruiters, and content strategists, this policy update is more than a tweak to platform guidelines. It signals a growing platform-wide push to preserve quality, trust, and authenticity in the age of synthetic content.

📊 Supporting Stats

• AI content is booming: According to Goldman Sachs, generative AI could automate up to 25% of content creation across industries by 2025.

• Low-quality content is on the rise: A 2024 report from 404 Media uncovered that a viral YouTube true crime channel was entirely AI-generated, sparking user backlash and wider platform scrutiny.

• Trust is fragile: Research from Edelman’s Trust Barometer shows that 61% of global consumers say they would lose trust in a platform if it profits from misleading or fake content.

✅ Pros - What’s Working?

• Clarification, not overreach: YouTube insists this is a “minor update” designed to provide clearer examples of inauthentic content. This could help creators better navigate what’s monetisable.

• Spam deterrence: Cracking down on mass-produced AI content helps reduce spam-like experiences for users, which could increase watch time for high-quality content.

• Brand protection: For advertisers, clearer boundaries help ensure their ads don’t appear alongside deepfakes, misinformation, or AI-generated “slop.”

⚠️ Cons - What Are the Limitations?

• Unclear enforcement: The actual policy language hasn’t been released, which creates uncertainty for creators and agencies alike.

• Reaction and remix grey areas: While YouTube says reaction videos and clip commentary are safe, the subjective nature of what counts as “original” could lead to over-moderation.

• Risk of over-correction: Without nuance, some small creators using AI ethically could be penalised alongside bad actors.

🔍 Opportunities - What Should Brands Focus On?

• Authenticity as currency: This policy shift reinforces that audiences (and platforms) value originality. Brands investing in distinctive, human-led content will stand out.

• Human-AI hybrids: AI isn’t banned - but lazy automation is. Brands can explore ethical, creative AI integration (e.g. voice cloning with disclosure, AI-enhanced scripting) that complements rather than replaces human input.

• Content audits: Now is a smart time to evaluate brand channels and partnerships for content integrity and alignment with evolving YPP standards.

🚧 Challenges - What Barriers Persist?

• Platform inconsistency: YouTube’s track record of enforcement is mixed. Scams, deepfakes, and AI spam still surface despite tools for reporting them.

• Speed of AI innovation: AI video creation is advancing faster than moderation systems can adapt. This creates whack-a-mole enforcement challenges.

• Monetisation anxiety: For creators and agencies managing influencer talent, these updates raise fears of sudden demonetisation without clear recourse.

📌 Key Takeouts

• YouTube is updating monetisation rules to combat AI-generated, repetitive, or spammy content.

• The update, while framed as minor, reflects growing concerns about platform quality and user trust.

• Ethical AI use is still allowed, but originality and value-add are critical.

• Brands must reassess content strategies, especially where AI tools are involved.

🎯 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Audit creator partnerships for content originality and compliance with YouTube’s evolving standards.

• Avoid full automation: Refrain from publishing fully AI-generated content without significant human input or editorial oversight.

• Prioritise disclosure: Where AI is used, make it transparent to viewers.

• Explore quality signals: Invest in creators and content that demonstrate thought leadership, creativity, and audience trust - all of which are likely to be favoured by future algorithms.

YouTube’s tightening grip on AI slop isn’t just policy housekeeping. It’s a cultural signal: originality still pays.

🕶️ Meta’s Smart Bet: Why Its €3B Stake in EssilorLuxottica Matters for Brand Marketers

Meta has reportedly acquired a 3% stake in EssilorLuxottica, the eyewear giant behind Ray-Ban and Oakley. The €3 billion ($3.5 billion) investment signals more than a financial move - it’s a strategic deepening of Meta’s long-term push into AI-powered hardware, particularly smart glasses. For brand marketers, this signals a growing convergence of fashion, tech, and augmented experiences - and a new frontier for branded interaction.

Smart Glasses Are Becoming Mainstream

Smart glasses are no longer novelty gadgets. Ray-Ban Meta glasses, launched in 2021, have seen stronger-than-expected uptake, prompting deeper collaboration between the two companies. The addition of Oakley-branded glasses in 2025 further expands Meta’s footprint.

According to Counterpoint Research, smart wearable shipments are expected to reach 600 million units globally by 2027, with smart glasses making up an increasing share thanks to their blend of function and style.

What’s Working: Pros

• Blending Style and Tech: Unlike bulky headsets, smart glasses from Meta x EssilorLuxottica integrate cameras, AI assistants, and voice commands into traditional eyewear styles.

• Brand Equity Built-In: Ray-Ban and Oakley bring decades of cultural cachet, helping smart glasses sidestep the “gadget” stigma that plagued earlier wearables.

• Direct-to-Consumer Ecosystem: Meta’s ownership of the hardware enables control over user data, interface, and services - bypassing gatekeepers like Apple or Samsung.

Limitations and Risks: Cons

• Privacy Backlash: Always-on cameras and voice assistants raise surveillance concerns, especially in public spaces.

• Fragmented Market: Many players - from Amazon to Snap - are competing, with no clear standard or dominant form factor yet.

• Battery and Tech Constraints: Miniaturisation of sensors and batteries remains a technical challenge, limiting extended use.

Opportunities for Brands

• Immersive Advertising: Smart glasses open the door for context-aware branded overlays - from virtual product try-ons to real-world-triggered content.

• Hands-Free Search and Commerce: AI-powered voice interfaces can enable seamless product discovery and voice shopping.

• Location-Based Activations: Brands could build activations where digital layers appear in physical spaces - offering exclusive content, offers, or narratives.

Challenges Ahead

• Platform Dependency: Early brand integration may hinge on Meta’s ecosystem, creating reliance on its APIs and data policies.

• User Adoption Curve: While growing, smart glasses adoption is still niche relative to smartphones or smartwatches.

• Creative Format Limitations: The screenless nature of some models means brands need to rethink UX beyond visuals.

Key Takeouts

• Meta’s €3B stake cements smart glasses as a core hardware pillar, not an experimental side project.

• The fusion of fashion and function (Ray-Ban, Oakley) gives smart glasses cultural traction.

• Brand experiences must evolve to fit AI-driven, screenless, voice-first interfaces.

• Smart glasses offer a glimpse into the future of ambient, always-available branded interaction.

Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Start Prototyping: Develop voice-first or audio-based branded content for wearable interfaces.

• Monitor Smart Wearables: Track consumer sentiment and behaviour around emerging smart glasses platforms.

• Engage Early: Partner with Meta or other platforms for early branded beta activations - to learn, iterate, and lead.

• Think Beyond the Screen: Rethink your brand’s identity in an ambient, visual-light, context-heavy future.

Meta’s investment in EssilorLuxottica is not just a bet on smart glasses - it’s a signpost toward the next major shift in how people experience digital content in the real world. For marketers, the time to explore is now.

📱 TikTok's US Reinvention: What It Means for Brands, Creators and Culture Marketers

TikTok is preparing to split. According to The Information (July 7, 2025), the platform is developing a U.S.-specific version of its app ahead of a possible sale to American investors. The redesigned app could hit U.S. app stores by 5 September, with users expected to migrate fully by March 2026.

This development is driven by U.S. political pressure: former President Donald Trump confirmed discussions with China are set to resume, stating a deal is “pretty much” in place. But Beijing’s stance on ByteDance divestment remains unclear, especially following tariff escalations earlier this year.

For brand and creator marketers, this is more than a policy story. It’s a shift in the infrastructure behind the most culturally potent social platform in the U.S., home to over 135 million monthly active users, and a key engine for youth trends, creator commerce, and real-time content discovery.

✅ Pros: What Could Work in Marketers’ Favour

Platform continuity, with political cover
If a U.S. version helps TikTok avoid a ban, the platform gets a new lease on life with less regulatory uncertainty. That brings much-needed stability to brands and creators who’ve held back due to legal ambiguity.

Opportunity for region-specific innovation
A U.S.-operated version could develop custom tools, formats and features tailored to domestic user behaviour and commercial needs. Think: better brand safety controls, integrated commerce, or enhanced first-party data access.

Potential return of cautious advertisers
TikTok’s U.S. ad revenue is expected to grow from around $10 billion in 2024 to over $14 billion in 2025. A U.S.-sanctioned version could trigger budget reallocation in Q4 and beyond, especially among marketers seeking a stable, scalable alternative to Meta or YouTube.

First-mover advantage during relaunch
If TikTok reframes itself publicly around the U.S. launch, early brand partners could benefit from increased visibility, promotional support, and platform favouritism.

❌ Cons: Risks and Limitations to Monitor

Fragmentation across markets
Two versions of TikTok could mean diverging algorithms, user interfaces, or product roadmaps. Global campaigns may require localisation not just in message, but in platform mechanics.

Friction in user migration
Users will need to download a new app by March 2026. That opens up a window of churn, confusion, and content drop-off - especially among less tech-savvy or casually engaged users.

Creator monetisation could stall
If monetisation tools (Creator Fund, gifts, brand collabs) lag during the transition, top creators may diversify to other platforms. That threatens TikTok’s cultural edge and brand reach.

Continued political exposure
Even if the app relaunches under U.S. ownership, regulatory scrutiny won’t vanish. Data practices, content moderation, and youth safety remain open targets for legislation.

⚠️ Watchouts for Brand, Creator and Influencer Marketers

• API and data access may change. Campaign measurement tools and analytics platforms could experience lags or require re-integration with the new U.S. app.

• Influencer performance benchmarks may reset. If engagement metrics shift due to user drop-off or algorithm tweaks, influencer rates and ROI models may need recalibration.

• Paid media planning needs agility. Paid placements might face a brief pause or changes in approval processes. Flexibility in budget allocation will be key.

• Creator contracts may need updating. Usage rights, timelines, and KPIs tied to TikTok activations should account for app migration scenarios and audience volatility.

📌 Key Takeouts

• TikTok is developing a new U.S.-specific app, reportedly launching 5 September 2025, with full user migration expected by March 2026.

• 135M+ U.S. monthly users and 1.6B+ globally are affected—core audiences for creator-led campaigns.

• Global ad revenue exceeded $23B in 2024, with U.S. revenue expected to hit $14B+ by end of 2025.

• If TikTok is pulled from the U.S., up to $8.6B in ad spend could migrate to competitors like Instagram and YouTube.

• This shift is both a risk and an opportunity for brands ready to move quickly and creatively.

🎯 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

1. Map exposure to TikTok U.S.
   Audit current spend, creator partnerships, and campaign dependencies. Identify key risks and backup plans.

2. Scenario-plan for split platforms.
   Develop strategies for U.S.-only TikTok operations, especially if global features diverge or if content must be localised for performance.

3. Engage creators early.
   Proactively brief creator partners on what’s known, plan long-term relationships, and be ready to support their transition between versions.

4. Monitor platform announcements closely.
   Watch for updates to commercial policies, new ad tools, and the timeline of deprecation for the old app.

5. Stay agile across your short-form mix.
   Invest in creative flexibility that can move between TikTok, Reels, Shorts, and emerging formats as needed.

TikTok’s U.S. reboot marks a new phase in the platform’s evolution - from global disruptor to regional battleground. For marketers, it’s not just about brand presence. It’s about preparedness, speed of response, and having the right creators in your corner as the next version of TikTok takes shape.

How TikTok's ‘Add To Music’ App Is Reshaping Streaming: What Marketers Need To Know

As music marketers, we’ve long known that TikTok is a top-of-funnel cultural engine for hits. But now, with its ‘Add To Music’ app integration, the platform is closing the loop between discovery and streaming in a way that’s both frictionless and powerful - with major implications for campaigns, fan strategy, and ROI.

After a full global rollout in 2024, TikTok’s Add To Music App feature is officially making waves. It’s earned the Music Consumer Innovation Award at the 2025 Music Week Awards and is already responsible for over one billion track saves to streaming platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Music, Amazon Music, Deezer, and - most recently - SoundCloud.

This is a behavioural shift.

📊 High-Impact Stats Marketers Shouldn’t Ignore

• 1+ billion tracks saved via Add To Music – TikTok

• SoundOn-released Show Me Love by WizTheMC hit No.3 in the UK and has clocked 446,009 units in consumption (Official Charts Company)

• TikTok has driven "many billions" of off-platform streams via the feature (TikTok internal data)

• Spotify’s Viral 50 Global charts are increasingly filled with tracks going viral on TikTok first

💡 Key Takeouts

• Discovery is now directly measurable: TikTok has gone from being a vibes-based virality machine to a performance marketing tool for music.

• Frictionless conversion: Fans can now move from swipe to stream with one tap, turning hype into habit.

• Full-funnel strategy is essential: From creation on TikTok to streaming platform performance, marketers now need to map and optimise the entire user journey.

• Platform loyalty is changing: SoundCloud’s integration signals TikTok’s ambition to stay platform-agnostic and support all music ecosystems - not just the majors.

✅ Pros for Music Marketers

• Direct attribution: For the first time, you can more confidently track TikTok virality to streaming spikes.

• Increased artist independence: With SoundOn and integrated streaming, TikTok offers a start-to-scale solution for unsigned acts.

• Cross-platform amplification: TikTok becomes a launchpad, not a silo. This creates a more sustainable post-viral trajectory.

⚠️ Considerations and Watchouts

• Short attention spans still rule: Saving a track doesn’t guarantee full streams or long-term fandom. Retention strategies are critical.

• Data visibility may be limited: Brands and marketers might not always have access to platform-level data unless integrated with label or platform partners.

• Over-reliance risk: Building campaigns too TikTok-heavy could limit audience diversity across age and genre lines.

⏭️ Next Steps for Music Marketers

1. Integrate Add To Music prompts into campaign storytelling. Highlight where fans can save or stream.

2. Build artist funnel strategies that account for TikTok virality and how to retain fans beyond the platform.

3. Use SoundOn smartly: Independent artists should explore how to tap TikTok’s in-house label services to maximise early traction.

4. Collaborate across DSPs: Use TikTok as the ignition point, but build out broader playlist and editorial support with platforms like Apple Music, Spotify, and YouTube Music.

🎯 What This Means for Brand Marketers

TikTok’s Add To Music feature isn’t just a win for artists - it’s a cultural leverage point for brands that want to tap into music-driven moments with sharper conversion and cultural impact.

Music has always been a brand’s shortcut to emotion. Now, it’s also a shortcut to action.

Whether you're launching a campaign, activating talent, or building a branded content series, TikTok’s integration with DSPs creates a new bridge between brand affinity and measurable behaviour.

💡 Key Opportunities for Brands:

• Drive deeper storytelling through sound: Branded content that uses emerging tracks can now help push them onto streaming platforms, giving your brand a role in music’s success story.

• Tap into music discovery culture: Partner with artists who are rising via TikTok and use the Add To Music feature to create a trackable journey from content to conversion.

• Use music as a campaign trigger: Think beyond sync - the right track placement in a brand moment can now translate directly into saves, shares, and streams.

• Enhance creator partnerships: Collaborate with creators who can integrate music authentically into their content and encourage followers to save tracks, linking fandom with action.

🚀 Bottom Line

TikTok’s Add To Music feature is more than a button: it’s a strategic shift in how music is marketed, discovered, and consumed. For artists and marketers alike, it’s time to rethink release strategies through the lens of TikTok-enabled streaming pathways.

This is music marketing in motion – and we’re just getting started.

🎬🎵 Why a Netflix x Spotify Deal Could Be the Next Big Power Play in Streaming Culture

In the ever-evolving landscape of entertainment and partnerships, the rumoured collaboration between Netflix and Spotify is one to watch closely. If confirmed, this deal could see the two streaming giants package music-related content that blends live events, award shows, and original programming. Think: Spotify-powered soundtracks fuelling Netflix docuseries, or live concerts and artist interviews delivered via dual-platform drops.

It’s more than a distribution deal. It’s a strategic alignment that speaks to where culture is heading: multiformat, music-driven, and fan-first.

Why Now?

Both platforms are navigating saturation in their core offerings. Netflix’s pivot into unscripted sports and music series - like “Rhythm & Flow,” the upcoming reboot of “Star Search,” and Beyoncé’s 2024 NFL Christmas Day performance - signals a move toward content with built-in fandoms. Meanwhile, Spotify is seeking new ways to monetise and expand beyond audio, especially as it competes with TikTok, YouTube and Apple for artist relationships and attention.

Together, they can create ecosystems around artist moments, rather than one-off plays.

What This Means for Brands and Fans

For brands, this opens up layered opportunities across media placement, co-branded experiences, and interactive fan engagement. Imagine a Spotify Wrapped x Netflix docu-special, or shoppable soundtracks from live shows. For artists and fans, it means deeper storytelling: from the studio to the stage to the screen.

The Bigger Picture

This partnership would be about creating cultural universes, not just content. It taps into how fans already behave - streaming an album, watching a behind-the-scenes series, attending the livestreamed tour finale. It also reflects a broader trend: streaming platforms aren’t just delivery systems - they're brand-builders and cultural curators.

In a world where fandom equals equity, expect more platforms to follow suit - blurring the lines between formats, moments, and media.

🎧 And if they pull it off right? It could be music to the entire industry’s ears.

Want more analysis on brand, entertainment and cultural strategy? Subscribe to the On The Record newsletter here: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/on-the-record-weekly-round-up-7339260441459654657/

The New Creative Frontier: Apple Music’s LA Studio

Opening this summer, Apple’s new three-storey, 15,000-square-foot studio in Culver City is designed to be more than just a recording space. It’s a physical manifestation of Apple Music’s artist-first strategy - combining Spatial Audio tech, a 4,000-square-foot live performance stage, and an integrated social content lab.

Rachel Newman, co-head of Apple Music, describes the space as “a place for artists to create, connect, and share their vision”. It reflects a broader industry trend: moving beyond passive streaming to become an engine for live experience, audience engagement, and original storytelling.

Pros - What’s Working?

An Artist-First Environment
Apple Music’s physical and digital platforms are built with artist experience at the core. From private booths for songwriting to high-end Spatial Audio production rooms, the infrastructure enables more direct artist expression and control.

Live, Immersive Content
With multicam shoots, live fan events, and real-time editing facilities, the studio supports high-value, multi-format content creation that can feed Apple Music, social platforms, and beyond.

Global Network, Local Roots
The LA space adds to Apple’s network of creative hubs in cities like Berlin, Paris, and Tokyo, showing a scalable model for culturally grounded innovation.

Cons - What Are the Limitations?

Exclusive by Design
Despite its ambition, the LA studio model is inherently selective. Access will likely be limited to top-tier or Apple-partnered artists, leaving emerging acts outside this elite circle.

Geographic Centralisation
Though described as global, the flagship hub is based in Los Angeles - reinforcing the dominance of the US music industry and potentially overlooking regional scenes and underground cultures elsewhere.

Limited Public-Facing Value
While immersive for artists, the behind-the-scenes nature of the space may offer less immediate value to casual listeners unless content is cleverly distributed across channels.

Opportunities - What Should Brands Watch?

Partnership Potential
The new studio offers fertile ground for brand partnerships - from live events and artist collaborations to integrated content that aligns with Apple’s values of creativity, quality, and innovation.

High-Fidelity Storytelling
The rise of Spatial Audio and multicam formats opens the door for brand narratives that go beyond conventional audio ads. There’s a chance to co-create immersive, artist-led content that resonates culturally.

Fan Experience Design
As platforms build richer ecosystems, brand marketers can learn from Apple’s seamless integration of tech, space, and narrative. How might physical and digital experiences converge in your own campaigns?

Challenges - What Could Undermine Success?

Streaming Saturation
With Spotify, Amazon, and TikTok also building out audio strategies, Apple’s success depends on maintaining its reputation for curation, exclusivity, and technical quality - not just catalogue size.

Monetisation Pressure
For brands, the question remains: how measurable is the ROI of audio storytelling and live music partnerships? Without clear pathways to attribution, it can be hard to justify spend.

Cultural Relevance
Apple must stay attuned to the shifting sounds of Gen Z and emerging subcultures. Without fresh, diverse representation, its artist-first vision risks becoming mainstream-first instead.

Key Takeouts

• Apple’s new LA studio exemplifies a decade-long shift toward artist-led content ecosystems.

• Spatial Audio and immersive production are shaping the future of music experience and storytelling.

• There’s growing space for brands to collaborate in culturally credible, high-quality ways.

• Access and diversity remain key tensions as elite platforms scale.

• Streaming services are evolving into full creative platforms - not just distributors.

Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Explore Spatial Audio: Invest in understanding how immersive formats can elevate your brand’s sonic identity.

• Build Artist Partnerships: Look beyond endorsements to co-create meaningful, narrative-led experiences.

• Activate Global Hubs: Identify opportunities in other Apple Music markets where brand–music collaboration can localise global strategies.

• Design for Cross-Channel: Ensure content created in premium environments like Apple’s studio is amplified across social, retail, and experiential touchpoints.

• Benchmark Against Apple’s Model: Use Apple’s approach as a blueprint for how to integrate creativity, culture, and technology with credibility.

If the past decade was about access, the next will be about intimacy, immersion, and identity - and Apple is already soundtracking that future.

Can This New Survey Save UK Live Music?

The UK’s live music culture is on the brink.

Between 2020 and 2023, nearly a third of grassroots music venues - 31% - shut their doors. In 2023 alone, 125 venues closed, a record-breaking blow. The situation is especially dire in London, where 35% of grassroots spaces have vanished since 2007. Festivals aren’t faring any better: 36 disappeared in 2023, followed by a staggering 78 more in 2024.

This is more than a cultural loss - it’s an economic one.

Live music contributes £5.2 billion to the UK economy and supports over 200,000 jobs. Yet the very venues that incubate new talent and power this ecosystem are being squeezed to the edge of extinction.

🔺 Security costs have surged 300% since 2019.
🔺 Nearly half of all venues now operate at a loss.
🔺 Collectively, they’re subsidising live music to the tune of £115 million.

All while navigating hostile planning laws, extreme licensing conditions, and an unsupportive policy environment.

This is a cultural emergency - and an economic one.

But amid the wreckage, there’s a flicker of hope. In a rare move, the UK Government has launched a full review of the grassroots sector, alongside a fan-led survey aimed at understanding the challenges faced by venues, artists, and fans alike.

It’s a welcome step. But let’s be clear: a review is only meaningful if it leads to urgent, tangible action.

What the UK’s music sector needs - now:

✅ Stronger legal protections for venues against noise complaints and third-party liability
✅ Planning reform to keep cultural spaces from being priced out or shuttered
✅ Targeted funding that reflects the vital role of live music in our creative economy

We’re not talking about handouts. We’re talking about investment in a national asset—one that fosters innovation, supports communities, and fuels global influence.

As Lord Kevin Brennan said in Parliament:

“Glastonbury is simply the apex of the great pyramid of the UK’s live and electronic music sector... The base of that pyramid is in danger of crumbling without due care and attention.”

He’s right. And if we want that pyramid to stand, we all need to act.

🎧 Take part in the UK Government’s survey (open until autumn):
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/208026/new-survey-invites-fans-to-help-shape-future-of-live-and-electronic-music/

🎤 Support the frontline with Music Venue Trust:
👉 musicvenuetrust.com

📣 Share this post. Talk to your MP. Stand with the people fighting to keep UK music alive.

This is about more than saving venues. It’s about saving culture.

The future of live music starts now - let’s not lose it.

Home Never Tasted So Good: Bold Bean Co's Budget-Genius Post-Glasto Brand Play

Picture this: It’s 8:30am at Paddington and Victoria Station. The scent of festival fatigue is in the air. And right there, among the commuters and crusty wellies, stands the Bold Bean Co team - B Corp certified and armed with usherette trays packed with 10,000 jars of Smoky Chilli Baked Beans.

Not your average Monday morning.

Their mission? Pure brand alchemy: intercepting the Glastonbury exodus with the promise of real food, real fast. No gimmicks. Just damn good beans.

This was less about scale and more about smarts. No flashy trucks or six-figure production. Just strategic timing, cultural intuition, and confidence in a product that speaks for itself. Because when your consumer has survived five days of pot noodles and 2am “mystery meat,” a jar of premium beans becomes emotional. One man even asked for a spoon to eat them cold on his second train. We respect the hustle.

This activation nailed the golden formula:

Right moment. Right message. Right medium.

Beans in usherette trays. Nostalgic, ridiculous, brilliant.

It also tapped the social tension beautifully: Glasto-goers were grateful. Regular commuters were suspicious. “Baked beans… in a jar?”, “I didn’t go to Glasto - can I still have one?” That pause? That curiosity? That’s where a challenger brand lives and thrives.

In a world of paid media saturation, this moment was human, low-fi and high-impact. It created stories, selfies, word-of-mouth and conversions. From confused commuters to hungover festival heads - Bold Bean met them where they were, and reminded them what real food tastes like.

And that tagline?
Home never tasted so good.
Chef’s kiss.

Takeaways for brands:

• You don’t need a mega-budget to create emotional resonance

• Knowing your audience’s emotional state is half the strategy

• Disruption can be delightful when it’s done with heart and timing

• People crave real - not just in food, but in brand experiences

And finally: a big shout out to Amelia Christie-Miller, Founder of Bold Bean Co - building a brand with soul (and serious hustle). 🫘 This is what clever, culture-savvy founder-led marketing looks like. Vision, timing, and a product that does the talking. Bravo.

Mission accomplished, Bold Bean. You made baked beans feel like a hug from home.

The Rise of the Sober Rave: Why Festivals Are Embracing Moderation

Festival culture is sobering up - literally.

In 2025, a new kind of headliner is taking the stage: moderation.

Long tied to indulgence and excess, festivals have traditionally been synonymous with alcohol. But for a growing number of Gen Z and Millennial audiences, that link is starting to fray. Instead, a cultural shift is gaining ground - one that prioritises presence, connection, and personal autonomy over default behaviours.

Whether driven by mental wellness, a desire to stay sharp, or simply shifting social norms, today’s festivalgoers are showing up differently. For many, the decision to go alcohol-free isn’t about missing out - it’s about showing up fully.

📉 The Stats Tell the Story

• In the US, alcohol consumption among 18–34s has fallen from 72% to 62% over the last two decades (Gallup).

• Gen Z drinks 20% less than Millennials at the same life stage (Berenberg/WSJ).

• 58% of Gen Z plan to drink even less in 2025, citing mental health and productivity (NCSolutions).

• The no/low alcohol market is growing at +10% CAGR globally (IWSR).

This shift isn’t hypothetical - it’s playing out across real spaces and live events. At Coachella 2025, Heineken® 0.0 reported a 125.5% increase in sales compared to the previous year. In the Netherlands, consumption of 0.0 beers at festivals rose by 35%. Globally, Heineken 0.0 is now available in over 120 markets.

But this is bigger than a single brand. It’s a cultural reset.

🍺 The Brands Moving With the Beat

Lucky Saint, the UK-based alcohol-free beer brand, has become a fixture at mass-participation events like the Hackney Half and the AJ Bell Great Manchester Run, serving on-tap 0.5% beer to thousands of runners. These aren’t sober-only spaces - these are mainstream, high-energy cultural moments where moderation isn’t marginal. With its new Lemon Lager and branded experiences, Lucky Saint is proving that 0.0 doesn’t mean compromise - it means choice.

Meanwhile, CleanCo, co-founded by Spencer Matthews, is expanding the no-alcohol spirits category with a growing portfolio of gin, rum, tequila and whiskey alternatives. Positioned as “beyond mocktails,” the brand sold 8.8 million drinks in 2024 and is backed by figures like England cricket captain Ben Stokes. It’s not just sober - it's serious. And it’s fast becoming a staple in both wellness spaces and premium nightlife.

Together, these brands reflect a growing truth: non-alcoholic isn’t niche anymore - it’s a domain with its own credibility, creativity and commercial weight.

🎯 What This Means for Festivals, Brands and Marketers

For Festival Organisers
Moderation isn’t the opposite of partying - it’s a new way to engage. Forward-thinking festivals are no longer hiding 0.0 options behind a side bar. Instead, they’re investing in premium non-alc experiences: curated menus, dedicated spaces, and credible partners that reflect the values of their audience. These additions aren’t just inclusive - they're commercial, experiential, and increasingly expected.

For Alcohol Brands
Zero-alc is no longer a side hustle. It’s a central pillar of future-facing portfolios. Brands need to move beyond “offering an option” and start positioning 0.0 products as relevant lifestyle choices with taste, branding, and storytelling to match. This is about expanding the category - not shrinking expectations.

For Brand Marketers
The shift towards moderation is an opportunity to rethink how joy, identity and connection are expressed. Campaigns that centre presence, confidence and clarity are landing harder than those tied to consumption. This generation doesn’t need alcohol to participate - they need to feel seen.

🎵 The New Festival Beat

The result? A cultural remix of the live experience. Less about numbing out, more about tuning in. As the sober-curious movement continues to grow, festivals are becoming more intentional spaces - where people can celebrate on their own terms.

Moderation is no longer a side note. It’s a headliner in its own right.

Doechii’s Glastonbury Looks Prove Fashion References Still Matter

In an era where cultural capital is currency, Doechii’s Glastonbury debut proved she’s already fluent. When the rising star stormed the West Holts stage in not one but three Vivienne Westwood looks – including a faithful nod to that Kate Moss micro mini - she wasn’t just performing. She was rewriting the brand x talent playbook through the lens of cultural fluency.

The move was more than stylistic synergy: it was a deliberate, layered message about legacy, rebellion, and creative alignment. Styled by Sam Woolf, Doechii’s “School of Hip-Hop” concept merged seamlessly with Westwood’s anarchic British heritage - think punk prep meets fashion archives, decoded for Gen Z.

What made it click? Timing and relevance. Glastonbury is synonymous with Moss, mud, and moment-making. Doechii channelled all three, referencing Westwood’s SS94 Café Society collection and paying homage to fashion’s rebellious godmothers - Kate and Naomi. But this was no nostalgia trip. The execution was sharp, contemporary, and thoroughly Doechii. Each look balanced homage with innovation, a skill that separates aesthetic mimicry from true cultural authorship.

This wasn’t about wearing vintage for the sake of retro cool. It was about placing Doechii in a lineage of powerful, genre-defining women - and staking a claim in British fashion history while doing it. The fact that Gen Z fans clocked the references and reposted them across TikTok? That’s cultural relevance in action.

Brand marketers take note: this is how you turn a headline performance into a long-tail cultural play. Through shared storytelling, stylistic credibility, and a sharp understanding of context, Doechii and Westwood reminded us that great collaborations aren’t about borrowing clout - they’re about amplifying narrative.

Because in 2025, it’s not just about showing up. It’s about showing up with intention.

AI Hitmakers and Algorithmic Hype: How Tech Took the Wheel in Culture

Meet The Velvet Sundown - a psychedelic rock “band” with over 400,000 monthly listeners on Spotify, two albums released in June, and zero confirmed human members. Their Spotify profile is verified, their bios are gibberish, and their band photos look like they were dreamt up by a machine. That’s because they probably were.

No one asked for an AI psych-rock band. But platforms made space for one. That’s the story.

Streaming services like Deezer report that nearly 20 percent of daily uploads are now fully AI-generated. No disclosure required. Spotify’s algorithms surface tracks based on predictive engagement patterns, not provenance or intent. For most users, that’s invisible. For brands, artists and culture strategists - it’s existential.

What we’re witnessing isn’t just the rise of AI in music. It’s the wider transformation of cultural influence from a human-led ecosystem to a machine-optimised economy. Tech isn’t just the stage anymore. It’s the writer, the producer and - most powerfully - the recommender.

This shift matters. Because for decades, cultural influence came from the margins. It started with subcultures, underground movements, niche tastemakers. But today, cultural moments increasingly start with algorithmic visibility: TikTok virality, FYP formatting, playlist placement.

Generative tools like AI image-makers or text-to-music models might still feel novel - but they’re scaling fast, and so are the incentives to use them. For platforms, synthetic content is cheap, controllable, and doesn’t argue about royalties. For brands chasing ‘always-on’ presence, it's tempting too.

But there’s a cost. When cultural relevance is reduced to performance metrics and recommendation logic, we risk losing the depth, risk-taking and community-first thinking that actually makes culture stick.

For brands and creators that care about legacy, not just visibility, this is the moment to double down on intent. The best strategy now isn’t to ignore tech - it’s to use it critically. To understand how it’s shaping taste and attention, yes - but to invest even harder in human insight, creative bravery and cultural point of view.

Because in this new era, the question isn’t can you scale content with AI. It’s: should you?

And if your brand wants to lead culture - not just fill the feed - you’ll need more than tools. You’ll need taste.

Protest, Platforms and the Politics of Performance: Who Decides What Belongs on Stage?

This year’s Glastonbury sparked a national conversation far beyond music, with performances by Bob Vylan and Kneecap now under police review and political scrutiny. Their sets included explicit political commentary, chants around the Israel-Palestine conflict, and criticism of political leaders - prompting questions about the role of artists, the responsibilities of broadcasters and festivals, and the place of government in shaping cultural spaces.

🔍 The Case for Responsibility and Oversight

Some argue that with freedom of expression comes responsibility - particularly when messages may be interpreted as inciting violence. When phrases like “Death to the IDF” or “start a riot” are broadcast to thousands, organisers and broadcasters face legitimate questions about where to draw the line. For critics, this isn't about silencing dissent, but about upholding public safety and ensuring platforms aren't used - intentionally or otherwise - to legitimise hate.

With events like Glastonbury carrying global reach, there’s pressure on institutions like the BBC to apply due diligence. Publicly funded organisations have accountability to a diverse audience, and it's argued that they must weigh the potential harm of broadcasting extreme or emotionally charged content without sufficient context.

🎙 The Case for Artistic Freedom and Cultural Space

On the other hand, protest has always had a place in art. Many see performances like these as part of a long tradition of artists using the stage to confront uncomfortable truths, provoke thought, and speak to lived experiences. To investigate or suppress those performances risks criminalising artistic expression and setting dangerous precedents for creative freedom.

Supporters of the artists argue that context matters: punk, satire, character performance and cultural commentary are often provocative by nature. Calls for censorship can flatten the complexity of these performances and disproportionately target marginalised or politically critical voices.

There is also concern around selective outrage - why are some forms of political speech tolerated while others face backlash? And at what point does state involvement in curating cultural content become interference?

🤝 A Shared Challenge

Ultimately, this is a complex issue with no easy answers. Festivals and broadcasters have a responsibility to ensure safe, inclusive spaces, but also to protect artistic expression. Governments, too, must tread carefully - upholding law and public order without encroaching on the creative freedoms that are vital to a healthy, democratic society.

These questions aren’t new, but they are urgent. As the lines between art, protest, and politics become increasingly blurred, institutions, audiences, and artists will need to navigate these tensions with nuance, empathy, and accountability.

🎗️ Amid all of this, it’s important to remember that the conversations sparked on stage reflect a backdrop of real human suffering. Whatever your views, humanitarian aid remains critical in Gaza and across conflict zones. If you’re able, consider donating to relief organisations delivering medical and essential support on the ground.

This is about more than what happens on stage - it’s about how we hold space for culture, conflict, and compassion at the same time.