🎮 Gaming Isn’t Just for Gen Z: Why Gen X and Boomers Are Leveling Up

Once seen as the domain of teenagers and twenty-somethings, gaming has evolved into a cross-generational powerhouse. Today, it’s not unusual to find 50-somethings streaming on Twitch or grandparents playing puzzle games on tablets. For brand marketers still stuck in the “Gen Z = gamer” mindset, it’s time to reset. Gaming is now a full-household channel, with significant implications for reach, resonance and media planning.

The Stats Speak Loudly

Gaming participation is up across older demographics:

• Nearly 60% of UK adults aged 45-54 played video games in 2023 (Statista) - up from 43% in 2013

• 41% of adults aged 55-64 are gamers

• 25% of over-65s now game regularly

• 32% of Europeans aged 45-64 play video games (Statista, 2024)

• In the US, 87% of Gen X and 81% of Boomers & Seniors game on mobile weekly (ESA, Essential Facts 2025)

• 205 million Americans play weekly across mobile, console and PC (ESA, 2025)

Pros - What’s Working?

• Massive mobile reach: Older adults over-index on mobile platforms, making it the most accessible gaming format.

• Health and wellbeing benefits: Games are increasingly used for cognitive stimulation, memory retention and social engagement among older players.

• Community building: Platforms like YouTube Gaming and Twitch are home to older creators who build sizeable, loyal followings.

• Diversified content: Casual, puzzle, and story-driven games appeal more to older audiences, expanding the creative brief for marketers.

Cons - What Are the Limitations?

• Persistent stereotypes: Many marketers still associate gaming primarily with youth culture, undercutting media strategy relevance.

• Creative blind spots: Older audiences may be missed in game-based advertising due to assumptions about platform use or content fit.

• Data visibility: Audience segmentation tools often default to younger demos, making it harder to extract insight from older gamer behaviours.

Opportunities - What Should Brands Explore?

• Intergenerational storytelling: Campaigns that reflect gaming as a shared household activity, not a generational silo.

• Product placement in casual games: Older gamers are highly active in puzzle and word games - prime spots for brand visibility.

• Wellness-focused content: Games designed with mindfulness, cognitive health or social connection can drive brand equity in ageing populations.

• Creator partnerships beyond Gen Z: Influencers in their 40s, 50s and 60s are building followings. Brands that engage them signal inclusivity and relevance.

Challenges - What Barriers Exist?

• Measurement gaps: Traditional ad metrics don’t always reflect nuanced usage across devices or generations.

• Cultural bias in strategy: Youth-oriented brand teams may miss opportunities due to lack of cultural empathy with older audiences.

• Fragmented platforms: Older gamers may prefer less social or more niche gaming environments, complicating channel planning.

Key Takeouts

• Gaming is no longer youth-exclusive - it’s a cross-generational media channel with mass reach.

• Older adults are gaming frequently, especially on mobile, and they are open to branded engagement.

• Stereotypes about who games - and how – are holding brands back.

• Opportunities lie in wellness, community, and casual game integration.

Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Audit your gaming assumptions: Is your current strategy over-indexed on Gen Z? If so, it’s time to rebalance.

• Brief for mobile-first, cross-generational reach: Design creative that appeals across age groups, especially Gen X and Boomers.

• Invest in creator diversity: Partner with older influencers to expand representation and relevance.

• Explore new formats: Think beyond traditional console tie-ins – mobile and casual games are where older gamers thrive.

• Champion inclusive design: Ensure your game-related content or ad placements are accessible, age-agnostic, and relevant to all players.

Want to reach everyone? Start with gaming. It's not fringe - it's foundational.

🎬 Nintendo Levels Up: Why Brand Expansion Into Film & TV Matters More Than Ever

Nintendo is no longer just a gaming company. With the success of The Super Mario Bros. Movie and the upcoming Legend of Zelda adaptation, the Japanese gaming giant is signalling a new era - one where its beloved IPs are not only playable, but watchable. Brand professionals should take note: this is more than a franchise cash-in, it’s a strategic shift in how iconic IPs are leveraged across entertainment platforms.

📊 The Stats Behind the Strategy

• The Super Mario Bros. Movie grossed over $1.3 billion USD globally, making it the second highest-grossing animated film of all time (Box Office Mojo, 2024).

• 84% of Gen Z say they prefer brands that bring stories to life across multiple formats - games, series, and movies (WARC, 2024).

• Nintendo’s IP expansion aligns with its strategy to “expand the number of people who have access to Nintendo IP”, according to President Shuntaro Furukawa.

This isn’t just smart marketing. It’s cross-generational world-building.

✅ Pros – What’s Working?

• Brand Longevity: Bringing legacy titles like Zelda to new media introduces them to younger audiences who might not own consoles.

• Creative Control: Nintendo’s hands-on production approach protects brand integrity and storytelling quality.

• Cultural Relevance: Film and TV adaptations keep franchises top-of-mind in a saturated entertainment landscape.

⚠️ Cons – What Are the Limitations?

• Creative Risk: Adapting beloved games carries high expectations. Any misstep (e.g. casting, tone) could alienate core fans.

• Resource Diversion: Investments in media production may risk focus on game innovation if not tightly managed.

• Platform Saturation: Not all IPs translate well to film or TV. The risk of overexposure is real.

🌟 Opportunities – Where Should Brands Pay Attention?

• Transmedia World-Building: Nintendo’s strategy mirrors what Marvel and Pokémon mastered - creating interconnected ecosystems across media.

• Merchandising & Licensing: Films open up new layers of monetisation through toys, apparel, and collabs.

• Brand Partnerships: New IP adaptations mean more opportunity for co-branded campaigns (e.g. fast food, fashion, streaming platforms).

🧱 Challenges – What Stands in the Way?

• IP Sensitivity: Nintendo fans are notoriously protective. Even high-quality adaptations must meet intense scrutiny.

• Global Consistency: Ensuring localisation, cultural relevance, and character authenticity across regions is complex.

• Distribution Dependence: Nintendo will likely rely on Hollywood’s gatekeepers - balancing control with accessibility is crucial.

🔑 Key Takeouts

• Nintendo is transitioning from a games-first company to a broader entertainment IP powerhouse.

• Visual media allows iconic franchises to evolve and reach new demographics.

• Maintaining quality, authenticity, and cultural alignment is critical for long-term success.

• This is part of a larger trend: brands becoming media ecosystems.

📍Next Steps for Brand Marketers

1. Study the Playbook: Analyse how Nintendo maintains creative control and authenticity in adaptations.

2. Think Ecosystem, Not Channel: Look beyond platform silos - how can your brand exist across experiences, not just campaigns?

3. Collaborate with IP Owners: Partnerships with legacy or fandom-rich brands can offer long-term cultural relevance.

4. Anticipate the Next Wave: If Metroid or Donkey Kong are next, expect a new slate of cross-media collabs and licensing openings.

Nintendo is building the blueprint for a future where IP is platform-agnostic and brand storytelling lives wherever audiences are watching, not just playing.

🧹 Cleaning House: YouTube Tightens Rules on AI-Generated ‘Slop’ Content

YouTube’s crackdown on “inauthentic” content marks a strategic shift in the platform’s fight against low-effort, AI-generated media. As of 15 July, the company will update its YouTube Partner Program (YPP) monetisation policies, targeting mass-produced and repetitive content - much of it now made possible by generative AI tools.

For brand marketers, recruiters, and content strategists, this policy update is more than a tweak to platform guidelines. It signals a growing platform-wide push to preserve quality, trust, and authenticity in the age of synthetic content.

📊 Supporting Stats

• AI content is booming: According to Goldman Sachs, generative AI could automate up to 25% of content creation across industries by 2025.

• Low-quality content is on the rise: A 2024 report from 404 Media uncovered that a viral YouTube true crime channel was entirely AI-generated, sparking user backlash and wider platform scrutiny.

• Trust is fragile: Research from Edelman’s Trust Barometer shows that 61% of global consumers say they would lose trust in a platform if it profits from misleading or fake content.

✅ Pros - What’s Working?

• Clarification, not overreach: YouTube insists this is a “minor update” designed to provide clearer examples of inauthentic content. This could help creators better navigate what’s monetisable.

• Spam deterrence: Cracking down on mass-produced AI content helps reduce spam-like experiences for users, which could increase watch time for high-quality content.

• Brand protection: For advertisers, clearer boundaries help ensure their ads don’t appear alongside deepfakes, misinformation, or AI-generated “slop.”

⚠️ Cons - What Are the Limitations?

• Unclear enforcement: The actual policy language hasn’t been released, which creates uncertainty for creators and agencies alike.

• Reaction and remix grey areas: While YouTube says reaction videos and clip commentary are safe, the subjective nature of what counts as “original” could lead to over-moderation.

• Risk of over-correction: Without nuance, some small creators using AI ethically could be penalised alongside bad actors.

🔍 Opportunities - What Should Brands Focus On?

• Authenticity as currency: This policy shift reinforces that audiences (and platforms) value originality. Brands investing in distinctive, human-led content will stand out.

• Human-AI hybrids: AI isn’t banned - but lazy automation is. Brands can explore ethical, creative AI integration (e.g. voice cloning with disclosure, AI-enhanced scripting) that complements rather than replaces human input.

• Content audits: Now is a smart time to evaluate brand channels and partnerships for content integrity and alignment with evolving YPP standards.

🚧 Challenges - What Barriers Persist?

• Platform inconsistency: YouTube’s track record of enforcement is mixed. Scams, deepfakes, and AI spam still surface despite tools for reporting them.

• Speed of AI innovation: AI video creation is advancing faster than moderation systems can adapt. This creates whack-a-mole enforcement challenges.

• Monetisation anxiety: For creators and agencies managing influencer talent, these updates raise fears of sudden demonetisation without clear recourse.

📌 Key Takeouts

• YouTube is updating monetisation rules to combat AI-generated, repetitive, or spammy content.

• The update, while framed as minor, reflects growing concerns about platform quality and user trust.

• Ethical AI use is still allowed, but originality and value-add are critical.

• Brands must reassess content strategies, especially where AI tools are involved.

🎯 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Audit creator partnerships for content originality and compliance with YouTube’s evolving standards.

• Avoid full automation: Refrain from publishing fully AI-generated content without significant human input or editorial oversight.

• Prioritise disclosure: Where AI is used, make it transparent to viewers.

• Explore quality signals: Invest in creators and content that demonstrate thought leadership, creativity, and audience trust - all of which are likely to be favoured by future algorithms.

YouTube’s tightening grip on AI slop isn’t just policy housekeeping. It’s a cultural signal: originality still pays.

🕶️ Meta’s Smart Bet: Why Its €3B Stake in EssilorLuxottica Matters for Brand Marketers

Meta has reportedly acquired a 3% stake in EssilorLuxottica, the eyewear giant behind Ray-Ban and Oakley. The €3 billion ($3.5 billion) investment signals more than a financial move - it’s a strategic deepening of Meta’s long-term push into AI-powered hardware, particularly smart glasses. For brand marketers, this signals a growing convergence of fashion, tech, and augmented experiences - and a new frontier for branded interaction.

Smart Glasses Are Becoming Mainstream

Smart glasses are no longer novelty gadgets. Ray-Ban Meta glasses, launched in 2021, have seen stronger-than-expected uptake, prompting deeper collaboration between the two companies. The addition of Oakley-branded glasses in 2025 further expands Meta’s footprint.

According to Counterpoint Research, smart wearable shipments are expected to reach 600 million units globally by 2027, with smart glasses making up an increasing share thanks to their blend of function and style.

What’s Working: Pros

• Blending Style and Tech: Unlike bulky headsets, smart glasses from Meta x EssilorLuxottica integrate cameras, AI assistants, and voice commands into traditional eyewear styles.

• Brand Equity Built-In: Ray-Ban and Oakley bring decades of cultural cachet, helping smart glasses sidestep the “gadget” stigma that plagued earlier wearables.

• Direct-to-Consumer Ecosystem: Meta’s ownership of the hardware enables control over user data, interface, and services - bypassing gatekeepers like Apple or Samsung.

Limitations and Risks: Cons

• Privacy Backlash: Always-on cameras and voice assistants raise surveillance concerns, especially in public spaces.

• Fragmented Market: Many players - from Amazon to Snap - are competing, with no clear standard or dominant form factor yet.

• Battery and Tech Constraints: Miniaturisation of sensors and batteries remains a technical challenge, limiting extended use.

Opportunities for Brands

• Immersive Advertising: Smart glasses open the door for context-aware branded overlays - from virtual product try-ons to real-world-triggered content.

• Hands-Free Search and Commerce: AI-powered voice interfaces can enable seamless product discovery and voice shopping.

• Location-Based Activations: Brands could build activations where digital layers appear in physical spaces - offering exclusive content, offers, or narratives.

Challenges Ahead

• Platform Dependency: Early brand integration may hinge on Meta’s ecosystem, creating reliance on its APIs and data policies.

• User Adoption Curve: While growing, smart glasses adoption is still niche relative to smartphones or smartwatches.

• Creative Format Limitations: The screenless nature of some models means brands need to rethink UX beyond visuals.

Key Takeouts

• Meta’s €3B stake cements smart glasses as a core hardware pillar, not an experimental side project.

• The fusion of fashion and function (Ray-Ban, Oakley) gives smart glasses cultural traction.

• Brand experiences must evolve to fit AI-driven, screenless, voice-first interfaces.

• Smart glasses offer a glimpse into the future of ambient, always-available branded interaction.

Next Steps for Brand Marketers

• Start Prototyping: Develop voice-first or audio-based branded content for wearable interfaces.

• Monitor Smart Wearables: Track consumer sentiment and behaviour around emerging smart glasses platforms.

• Engage Early: Partner with Meta or other platforms for early branded beta activations - to learn, iterate, and lead.

• Think Beyond the Screen: Rethink your brand’s identity in an ambient, visual-light, context-heavy future.

Meta’s investment in EssilorLuxottica is not just a bet on smart glasses - it’s a signpost toward the next major shift in how people experience digital content in the real world. For marketers, the time to explore is now.

📱 TikTok's US Reinvention: What It Means for Brands, Creators and Culture Marketers

TikTok is preparing to split. According to The Information (July 7, 2025), the platform is developing a U.S.-specific version of its app ahead of a possible sale to American investors. The redesigned app could hit U.S. app stores by 5 September, with users expected to migrate fully by March 2026.

This development is driven by U.S. political pressure: former President Donald Trump confirmed discussions with China are set to resume, stating a deal is “pretty much” in place. But Beijing’s stance on ByteDance divestment remains unclear, especially following tariff escalations earlier this year.

For brand and creator marketers, this is more than a policy story. It’s a shift in the infrastructure behind the most culturally potent social platform in the U.S., home to over 135 million monthly active users, and a key engine for youth trends, creator commerce, and real-time content discovery.

✅ Pros: What Could Work in Marketers’ Favour

Platform continuity, with political cover
If a U.S. version helps TikTok avoid a ban, the platform gets a new lease on life with less regulatory uncertainty. That brings much-needed stability to brands and creators who’ve held back due to legal ambiguity.

Opportunity for region-specific innovation
A U.S.-operated version could develop custom tools, formats and features tailored to domestic user behaviour and commercial needs. Think: better brand safety controls, integrated commerce, or enhanced first-party data access.

Potential return of cautious advertisers
TikTok’s U.S. ad revenue is expected to grow from around $10 billion in 2024 to over $14 billion in 2025. A U.S.-sanctioned version could trigger budget reallocation in Q4 and beyond, especially among marketers seeking a stable, scalable alternative to Meta or YouTube.

First-mover advantage during relaunch
If TikTok reframes itself publicly around the U.S. launch, early brand partners could benefit from increased visibility, promotional support, and platform favouritism.

❌ Cons: Risks and Limitations to Monitor

Fragmentation across markets
Two versions of TikTok could mean diverging algorithms, user interfaces, or product roadmaps. Global campaigns may require localisation not just in message, but in platform mechanics.

Friction in user migration
Users will need to download a new app by March 2026. That opens up a window of churn, confusion, and content drop-off - especially among less tech-savvy or casually engaged users.

Creator monetisation could stall
If monetisation tools (Creator Fund, gifts, brand collabs) lag during the transition, top creators may diversify to other platforms. That threatens TikTok’s cultural edge and brand reach.

Continued political exposure
Even if the app relaunches under U.S. ownership, regulatory scrutiny won’t vanish. Data practices, content moderation, and youth safety remain open targets for legislation.

⚠️ Watchouts for Brand, Creator and Influencer Marketers

• API and data access may change. Campaign measurement tools and analytics platforms could experience lags or require re-integration with the new U.S. app.

• Influencer performance benchmarks may reset. If engagement metrics shift due to user drop-off or algorithm tweaks, influencer rates and ROI models may need recalibration.

• Paid media planning needs agility. Paid placements might face a brief pause or changes in approval processes. Flexibility in budget allocation will be key.

• Creator contracts may need updating. Usage rights, timelines, and KPIs tied to TikTok activations should account for app migration scenarios and audience volatility.

📌 Key Takeouts

• TikTok is developing a new U.S.-specific app, reportedly launching 5 September 2025, with full user migration expected by March 2026.

• 135M+ U.S. monthly users and 1.6B+ globally are affected—core audiences for creator-led campaigns.

• Global ad revenue exceeded $23B in 2024, with U.S. revenue expected to hit $14B+ by end of 2025.

• If TikTok is pulled from the U.S., up to $8.6B in ad spend could migrate to competitors like Instagram and YouTube.

• This shift is both a risk and an opportunity for brands ready to move quickly and creatively.

🎯 Next Steps for Brand Marketers

1. Map exposure to TikTok U.S.
   Audit current spend, creator partnerships, and campaign dependencies. Identify key risks and backup plans.

2. Scenario-plan for split platforms.
   Develop strategies for U.S.-only TikTok operations, especially if global features diverge or if content must be localised for performance.

3. Engage creators early.
   Proactively brief creator partners on what’s known, plan long-term relationships, and be ready to support their transition between versions.

4. Monitor platform announcements closely.
   Watch for updates to commercial policies, new ad tools, and the timeline of deprecation for the old app.

5. Stay agile across your short-form mix.
   Invest in creative flexibility that can move between TikTok, Reels, Shorts, and emerging formats as needed.

TikTok’s U.S. reboot marks a new phase in the platform’s evolution - from global disruptor to regional battleground. For marketers, it’s not just about brand presence. It’s about preparedness, speed of response, and having the right creators in your corner as the next version of TikTok takes shape.

Most Brands Get Fandom Wrong. Here’s Why.

Fandom is having a moment. Again.

There are endless headlines about the rise of the “new” fan - hyper-engaged, platform-native, born into meme culture and fluent in niche. Reports churn out taxonomies and traits: the Gen Z sports obsessive, the K-pop stan, the streaming superfan. The message is clear: fans are a powerful cohort, and brands need to figure them out.

But here's the problem: most of the conversation still treats fandom like a fixed attribute - a type of person to be targeted, instead of a context-dependent behaviour to be earned.

Let’s be clear: fandom is not a personality type. It’s a response.
It emerges when the right conditions exist - when people find cultural meaning, community, emotional return or creative agency in the worlds they connect with.

Some of those conditions are designed. Others are accidental. But none of them are guaranteed.

Fandom is a system, not a segment

Brands love segmentation: who are these fans, where do they live, what’s their disposable income? Useful in some ways. But it misses the deeper point.

Two people with the same music taste or media habits might engage in wildly different ways depending on what the cultural system around them offers:

• One fan watches passively. Another edits tour footage into narrative arcs with fan theories, inside jokes and timeline canon.

• One buys a jersey. Another crowdfunds a documentary to preserve the club’s grassroots story.

• One streams the album. Another builds a Discord server that outlives the release cycle.

Same interest. Different conditions. Different behaviour.

Fandom is shaped by access, expectation, community design, and the level of creative or emotional input the world around it allows. It’s not a thing people bring. It’s a thing they build - often in response to how a brand, artist or platform sets the tone.

Behaviour > Belonging

Want to understand the future of fandom? Don’t ask “Who are these people?” Ask “What are they able (or invited) to do?”

• Are they given tools to remix and reframe stories?

• Is there frictionless access to the source or mystique to unravel?

• Is it reciprocal, performative, devotional, communal?

• Does the platform enable connection or gatekeep it?

Some of the most successful fandoms didn’t scale because of who the fans were, but because of what the ecosystem allowed:

• The NBA’s growth among Gen Z isn’t about youth appeal alone. It’s about its embrace of player-as-creator culture - from TikTok to League Fits to podcasting.

• Coachella’s branded relevance isn’t rooted in legacy. It’s powered by the annual ritual of fashion, identity play, livestream hype, and digital presence far beyond the desert.

• Dungeons & Dragons’ renaissance didn’t come from rebranding the game. It came from opening the gates, letting players become performers, creators and communities.

Numbers to know

• 63% of Gen Z say they connect more deeply with brands that help them express or create, not just consume (GWI, 2024).

• The top 10% of artist superfans drive over 40% of digital music revenue - not just through streaming, but through ticketing, merch, and premium content (MIDiA Research).

• Fandom-first platforms like Discord, AO3 and Letterboxd are growing faster than social platforms in active engagement metrics year-on-year (WARC, 2024).

So what does this mean for brands?

If you want to build real fandom, stop treating it like a demographic to court.

Instead:

• Design for behaviour. Enable rituals, remixing, self-expression. Create the tools and signals that allow fans to act.

• Respect the tempo. Not all engagement is always-on. Some fandoms thrive on drops, delays, suspense.

• Map the inputs. Fandom isn’t output. It’s what happens when the cultural inputs - intimacy, relevance, recognition - align.

Because you don’t own fandom. You don’t get to define it.

You only get to design the conditions where it can emerge - or not.

Sources:

• GWI “Future of the Creator Economy” Report, 2024

• MIDiA Research: “Superfans & Monetisation” 2023

• WARC: “Fandom Platforms 2024 Benchmark”

Wimbledon 2025: Reinventing Tradition to Thrive in the Attention Economy 🎾🔥

Wimbledon is more than just a tennis tournament - it’s a cultural institution that has stood the test of time. Yet, as we live in an era where attention is the most valuable currency, even this iconic event must evolve to stay relevant. Under the leadership of Sally Bolton, CEO of the All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC), Wimbledon is striking a powerful balance between honouring its rich traditions and embracing bold innovations.

🎯 Competing for Attention in a Saturated Market

In today’s entertainment landscape, Wimbledon faces fierce competition - not just from other sports, but from an endless stream of digital content vying for people’s attention. Bolton acknowledges, “It’s the attention economy, and we’re trying to maintain our share of that.” With a global audience that’s more fragmented than ever, this challenge has pushed Wimbledon to rethink how it engages fans.

📱 Engaging the Next Generation

Wimbledon’s innovative digital initiatives are game-changers. Take WimbleWorld on Roblox - launched in 2022, it has already attracted 19.5 million visits, connecting the tournament with a younger, digitally native audience in a fun and interactive way. This move signals Wimbledon's commitment to evolving beyond traditional broadcasting and stadium experiences.

🌍 Global Expansion: The U.S. and India

Wimbledon is expanding its footprint globally. In the U.S., the tournament partnered with ESPN and recreated “The Hill” experience in New York, bringing a slice of Wimbledon culture stateside. Meanwhile, in cricket-loving India, collaborations with legends like Sachin Tendulkar have introduced Wimbledon to new fans, tapping into vibrant, passionate sports communities.

📈 Business Growth Through Audience Engagement

This strategic approach is paying off. Over the past decade, Wimbledon’s revenue has more than doubled, soaring from £170 million to approximately £400 million. This growth reflects the success of deepening fan engagement and expanding reach without compromising the tournament’s heritage.

🏟️ Balancing Tradition with Innovation

Wimbledon continues to evolve while holding tight to its core identity. Innovations like electronic line calling and the online ticket ballot system show how technology can enhance the experience without eroding tradition. Bolton puts it best: Wimbledon is “always changing, always staying the same.”

🛍️ Beyond the Tournament: Building a Lifestyle Brand

Wimbledon isn’t just about the fortnight on the courts anymore. With nearly 100,000 visitors annually to its museum and a growing online retail presence, it’s positioning itself as a global lifestyle brand. This allows fans worldwide to connect with Wimbledon’s essence, even if they can’t be there in person.

🔮 The Future of Wimbledon

Looking forward, Wimbledon is set to remain a premier event by continuing to adapt thoughtfully. Bolton’s vision ensures the tournament will maintain its unique charm while meeting the demands of the modern attention economy.

For a deeper dive into Sally Bolton’s strategy and vision for Wimbledon’s future, check out the full Financial Times interview here:
ft.com - Sally Bolton on Wimbledon

For more thoughtful analysis on culture, fashion, music, sport, and brand strategy - including how brands like Wimbledon navigate today’s complex cultural landscape - subscribe to On The Record, my LinkedIn newsletter delivering curated insights and fresh perspectives straight to your feed: Subscribe here to On The Record.

Lessons from Formula 1’s Off-Track Expansion

In the ever-evolving landscape of brand marketing, cultural relevance is the north star. While traditional metrics like sales and market share remain essential, the brands that truly thrive are those that embed themselves into the cultural zeitgeist. Formula 1’s recent off-track expansion is a textbook example of how to master cultural relevance by extending brand influence far beyond the core product.

From Racetrack to Runway: The Expansion of F1’s Influence

Under Liberty Media’s stewardship, F1 has shed its image as a niche motorsport for die-hard fans and embraced its identity as a global entertainment juggernaut. The shift from a purely competitive spectacle to a multimedia entertainment property has unlocked vast new revenue streams. From star-studded events like the F1 75 launch at London’s O2 Arena to immersive experiences like the F1 Exhibition and F1 Arcade, the brand now offers multiple entry points for fans — both avid and casual.

What makes this strategy so effective is its alignment with cultural moments. Take the Netflix phenomenon Drive to Survive, which humanised drivers, crafted compelling storylines, and created a binge-worthy narrative for audiences beyond motorsport enthusiasts. Similarly, partnerships with Lego and Mattel transformed the F1 experience into tangible, playful moments for all age groups, generating billions of views through engaging activations like the Lego F1 cars racing around the Las Vegas Sphere.

Creating Cultural Capital: More Than Just Merchandise

F1’s partnerships are not merely transactional — they build cultural capital. Aligning with the right collaborators amplifies relevance. From nostalgic licensing deals with Snoopy and Lego to tapping into Hollywood with Brad Pitt’s upcoming F1 movie, the sport has intentionally extended its universe. It’s no longer just about who wins the Grand Prix; it’s about how fans experience F1 through stories, products, and social moments.

This multi-channel approach mirrors the Disneyfication model — offering diverse brand touchpoints that cater to different life stages. The brand experience evolves from toy cars in childhood to immersive gaming bars in adulthood, demonstrating longevity and sustained relevance.

Lessons for Brands: Crafting Cultural Relevance

For brands seeking to replicate F1’s success, here are three key takeaways:

1. Narrative First, Product Second: Build stories that resonate emotionally. Audiences want to engage with brands that offer cultural storytelling, not just transactions. F1’s storytelling — from on-track rivalries to driver personalities — has become a key draw.

2. Expand Your Universe: Collaborate with culturally relevant partners to create unexpected experiences. Partnerships that align with fan passions — music, film, gaming — offer authentic extensions of the brand.

3. Engage the Senses: F1’s CCO Emily Prazer noted the importance of enabling fans to “smell it, touch it and sell it to understand it.” Brands that prioritise immersive, experiential moments — whether physical or digital — deepen emotional connections.

The Future of Cultural Relevance

The brands winning in today’s culture-led economy are those that embrace entertainment, storytelling, and experience. As the traditional lines between sport, music, film, and lifestyle blur, brands that integrate themselves into these narratives will stand out.

F1’s journey serves as a powerful reminder: cultural relevance is not a byproduct of success — it is the driving force. For marketers, the challenge is clear: campaigns are essential, but thinking beyond them to create lasting cultural moments is what truly sets brands apart. The brands that do will find themselves not just participating in the conversation, but leading it.

Tariff Threats, Cultural Fallout: How Trump's Trade War Shapes Brand Influence in Sports, Music, Entertainment, Alcohol, Beauty, Tech, Gaming, and Luxury Fashion

As Donald Trump escalates his rhetoric around tariffs and trade wars, brands across sports, music, entertainment, alcohol, beauty, tech, gaming, and luxury fashion face a new wave of uncertainty. While tariffs are traditionally discussed in economic terms, their ripple effects extend far beyond pricing and supply chains—impacting cultural relevance, brand positioning, and consumer sentiment in profound ways.

The Fragility of Cultural Capital

For brands, cultural relevance isn’t just about selling products—it’s about shaping conversations, driving engagement, and building communities. Tariffs disrupt this equilibrium by forcing brands to rethink their partnerships, pricing, and global market strategies. In industries reliant on cultural cachet—where perception is everything—this unpredictability is a dangerous game.

Music, Entertainment & Sports: A Collateral Cultural War

The music and entertainment industries are deeply intertwined with global trade. Merchandising, touring, streaming, and even the availability of musical instruments and production equipment are all vulnerable to tariff hikes. If Trump's policies trigger retaliatory measures from key markets like Europe or China, artists and entertainment brands could face rising costs, regulatory hurdles, and strained international relationships.

Canada has already warned of the impact of tariffs on the live music industry, with the Canadian Live Music Association’s president and CEO, Erin Benjamin, highlighting the uncertainty caused by these threats. While acknowledging the risks, she also pointed to opportunities for the domestic music scene, reinforcing the importance of supporting local talent. Similarly, Spencer Shewen, artistic director of the Mariposa Folk Festival, noted that Canadian talent is becoming even more dominant in response to these trade disruptions. (rootsmusic.ca)

Sports brands, which thrive on cross-border sponsorships and global fan engagement, also risk disruption. If tariffs hit apparel and footwear—industries already navigating economic headwinds—companies like Nike, adidas, and Puma may pass costs onto consumers, affecting accessibility and eroding brand loyalty. Meanwhile, American sports leagues with international ambitions (such as the NBA and MLS) may face backlash if geopolitical tensions sour overseas market expansion.

Alcohol & Beauty: Luxury, Exclusivity, and Market Volatility

The alcohol and beauty industries thrive on perception. Luxury spirits and premium beauty brands are global status symbols, carefully curated to resonate across cultures. But tariffs on European imports—think Scotch whisky, Champagne, and premium fragrance houses—create pricing volatility that alters the aspirational appeal of these products. Trump’s recent threat of a 200% tariff on European wines, Champagnes, and spirits has raised alarms among U.S. importers and retailers, with industry leaders warning of drastic reductions in demand. 

This isn’t just an economic issue; it’s a cultural one. If once-affordable luxury becomes unattainable, brand desirability could shift, opening the door for regional competitors to fill the void.

Luxury Fashion: The Price of Prestige

Luxury fashion is particularly vulnerable to tariffs, as it relies heavily on European craftsmanship and heritage. Iconic brands like Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Gucci, and Prada may face higher import duties on leather goods, handbags, and apparel. This could force them to either absorb the cost, reduce margins, or increase prices—potentially alienating aspirational consumers and affecting desirability.

A significant part of luxury fashion’s cultural relevance stems from its accessibility at various levels, whether through entry-level products like perfumes and accessories or high-end ready-to-wear collections. If tariffs disrupt this balance, the exclusivity that defines luxury could shift—creating an opportunity for emerging designers or locally produced alternatives to capture market share.

Additionally, the resale market—driven by platforms like The RealReal and StockX—could also be affected, as pricing adjustments ripple through the industry. This would impact not only luxury houses but also the broader ecosystem of influencers, stylists, and cultural tastemakers who contribute to brand storytelling and desirability.

Tech & Gaming: The Cost of Innovation

Tech and gaming are arguably the most exposed industries in this scenario. Manufacturing dependencies in China, Taiwan, and South Korea make hardware companies and gaming brands vulnerable to cost spikes. PlayStation, Xbox, and PC gaming brands may be forced to adjust pricing or delay product launches. Meanwhile, content creators—whose cultural influence extends beyond gaming into music, fashion, and film—may find sponsorship deals and brand collaborations disrupted as companies cut budgets in response to rising costs.

Analysis suggest that these tariff measures could lead to a 0.3% decrease in the U.S. GDP and a 0.2% reduction in the capital stock, reflecting potential declines in investment and economic growth. 

The Brand Strategy Imperative

For brands navigating this turbulent landscape, staying culturally relevant requires more than just financial agility. The brands that will emerge strongest are those that:

1. Double Down on Localised Storytelling: Brands should pivot their marketing strategies to lean into regional narratives, ensuring resonance even if global trade frictions impact accessibility.

2. Strengthen Authentic Collaborations: Strategic partnerships with artists, athletes, and cultural icons can help maintain brand desirability despite economic uncertainty.

3. Emphasise Sustainability & Ethical Sourcing: In a world increasingly driven by conscious consumerism, brands that champion domestic production, sustainability, and ethical sourcing can turn trade challenges into opportunities.

4. Adapt Pricing & Accessibility Strategies: Flexible pricing models, exclusive drops, and creative bundling can help maintain consumer interest despite tariff-induced cost fluctuations.

Final Thought: Tariffs as a Cultural Test

Trump’s tariff threats aren’t just about economics; they’re a litmus test for brand resilience in an era of geopolitical and cultural flux. The most successful brands won’t just react to economic policy—they’ll shape their own narratives, ensuring they remain relevant, desirable, and culturally indispensable in a world that’s constantly shifting beneath their feet.

The question is: will your brand weather the storm, or will it become another casualty of cultural irrelevance?

The Future of Gaming in 2025: AI, Live Service Fatigue & Industry Shifts

Key Takeouts

• AI in game development is a double-edged sword, offering efficiency but risking a loss of creative integrity.

• Live service models are losing favour, with audiences seeking more meaningful, contained experiences.

• The console wars are fading, as access and cross-platform experiences become more important than hardware.

• Funding challenges threaten innovation, with financial pressures limiting the scope for experimental game development.

• GTA 6 will be a defining moment, setting the tone for the future of AAA gaming and open-world experiences.

The global games industry in 2025 finds itself in an era of transformation, teetering between innovation and instability. What was once a space of boundless expansion has hit an inflection point, where technological disruption, economic pressures, and shifting player expectations are forcing the industry to redefine itself. The question now is not simply what games will look like in the coming years, but whether the structures that have sustained the industry for decades can continue to hold.

One of the most contentious developments is the increasing presence of AI in game development. On the surface, AI-powered tools promise efficiency—faster asset creation, streamlined animation, even AI-driven narrative design. But beneath the surface lies a deeper, more uncomfortable debate. What happens when automation starts to displace human creativity? The industry has always thrived on artistic expression, on the distinct fingerprints of developers crafting something singular. If studios prioritise AI-generated content to cut costs, will we see a decline in the uniqueness that makes games a cultural force? The push-and-pull between technological progress and creative integrity is set to define this decade.

Beyond the question of AI, the business of gaming itself is under scrutiny. Live service models, which once seemed like the holy grail of engagement and revenue, are now facing significant fatigue. While some franchises continue to dominate, the market is oversaturated, and audiences are growing weary of time-consuming, microtransaction-heavy experiences that demand continuous investment. Players are signalling a desire for more contained, meaningful narratives rather than endless content cycles, yet publishers are still gambling on the next big live service hit. The industry stands at a crossroads—will it double down on a model that is proving increasingly unsustainable, or will it recalibrate to meet the changing desires of its audience?

At the same time, the hardware landscape is undergoing a shift that few could have predicted a decade ago. The traditional battle between gaming consoles is becoming increasingly irrelevant as cross-platform play, cloud gaming, and subscription services break down the old silos. The latest console iterations have struggled to justify their existence in a market that is no longer defined by hardware exclusivity. For the new generation of players, access and experience outweigh brand loyalty, and the companies that embrace this reality will shape the future of the industry.

But for all the conversations around technology and business models, one of the most urgent challenges facing game development today is funding. Even as gaming continues to expand its cultural footprint, financial pressures are mounting. Major studios are downsizing, independent developers are struggling to secure investment, and the market is flooded with an overwhelming volume of new releases competing for limited attention. Where does the money come from for the next wave of truly groundbreaking games? If the financial structures underpinning the industry continue to shrink, we risk a landscape dominated only by the safest, most commercially viable projects, leaving little room for bold, experimental work.

Perhaps the clearest indicator of where the industry is heading lies in the anticipation surrounding GTA 6. Few games carry the weight of expectation quite like this one. Beyond being a guaranteed commercial juggernaut, it will set a precedent for the future of open-world gaming, player-driven content, and the broader blockbuster gaming experience. Will its approach reaffirm the industry's reliance on vast, expansive worlds, or will it point toward a new direction where more curated, concentrated experiences take centre stage? More than just a release, its impact will be a statement on where gaming is headed.

As 2025 unfolds, it is evident that gaming is in a moment of cultural and structural transition. The industry must decide what kind of future it wants to create—not just in terms of technological advancement, but in how it values creativity, sustainability, and the communities that sustain it. Whether this moment leads to reinvention or stagnation will depend on the choices made now, but one thing is certain: the future of gaming is being written in real time.

The Evolution of Podcasts: Navigating a Shifting Cultural Landscape

Not long ago, defining a podcast was simple. It was an audio show, distributed via RSS feeds to various platforms, consumed primarily through listening. But today, the lines are blurred. YouTube is now a leading podcast platform, Spotify has embraced video, and monetisation has expanded beyond ad sales into live tours, merch, newsletters, and social media activations. The very notion of what a podcast is—and where it belongs—has become increasingly fluid.

This shift is not just about semantics; it has profound implications for creators, audiences, and the business of content distribution. The once-clear boundaries between podcasts, traditional broadcasting, and influencer-driven media have dissolved. Today’s biggest podcast names are just as likely to be digital-first content creators who bypassed traditional audio production as they are veterans from public radio. The industry is being reshaped by new audience behaviours, platform priorities, and the rising power of personal brands.

The Fragmentation of Audio and Video

For years, podcasting was an audio-first medium, a space where storytelling, conversation, and journalism thrived through the power of the human voice. But as visual platforms like YouTube and TikTok push further into spoken content, podcasts are becoming a hybrid of audio and video experiences. Does this mean a podcast is now simply content that can be understood whether heard or watched? Some argue that the term no longer serves a clear purpose at all.

A similar shift occurred in television and film. Streaming services disrupted traditional formats, blurring distinctions between cinema and episodic content. Now, podcasting is experiencing its own disruption. “Simulcast,” “new broadcast,” and other attempts to redefine the space hint at a broader transformation. The medium is no longer constrained by its original technical definition; it is evolving into an adaptable, multi-platform experience.

The Business of Podcasting: Where Do Creators Fit?

As the industry expands, so do the economic stakes. Who owns the rights to monetise a podcast when it exists as a YouTube series, a live tour, and a merch-driven brand? Should podcasters be classified as influencers, tapping into the multi-billion-dollar creator economy, or should they remain within the podcast advertising ecosystem? These questions are no longer theoretical—they are shaping the financial models that sustain creators and networks alike.

Podcast networks and platforms must now structure deals that account for the fluidity of content distribution. The power dynamics between creators, distributors, and advertisers are shifting. The challenge is not just about defining what a podcast is, but also about ensuring sustainable revenue streams for those who create them.

The Future of Podcasting: A Cultural Reframing

At its core, podcasting has always been about storytelling and community. Whether through an intimate conversation, investigative reporting, or deep-dive analysis, the format thrives on engagement. Perhaps the most enduring definition of a podcast is not a technical one, but a cultural one: a platform for voices, narratives, and ideas to resonate in an increasingly fragmented digital landscape.

If podcasts are to remain relevant, they must continue to evolve alongside audience habits and technological shifts. The question is not just “What is a podcast?” but “How do we continue to build meaningful experiences in a world where content exists everywhere?” The answer will shape the future of storytelling itself.

Kendrick Lamar Just Proved: The Revolution Will Be Televised

9th February 2025

Cultural relevance isn’t just about showing up—it’s about shaping the moment. And last night at Super Bowl halftime, Kendrick Lamar did exactly that on one of the biggest stages in the world.

From Samuel L. Jackson playing a modern-day Uncle Sam—mocking Kendrick and telling him to “play the game”—to Lamar standing in front of an American flag formed entirely by Black dancers, every frame of his Super Bowl LIX halftime show was designed to challenge, provoke, and solidify hip-hop’s place at the centre of culture. As he stood before the flag performing HUMBLE., the message was clear—sit down, be humble wasn’t just a lyric, it was a challenge to the system itself. Gil Scott-Heron’s words echoed louder than ever—this time, the revolution was televised.

Dressed in Deion Sanders’ classic Nike sneakers and flared Hedi Slimane Celine jeans, Kendrick blended high fashion with hip-hop’s DNA, while his pgLang ‘GLORIA’ jacket and ‘a minor’ chain teased the Converse collab drop that went live right after the show. Cultural storytelling at its finest.

But beyond the style, the gaming references ran deep—because Kendrick isn’t just tapping into the culture; he’s part of it. A well-known gamer, he’s spoken about his love for video games, and last night, that influence was undeniable. The set itself was a giant controller, symbolising the struggle for power, agency, and who really gets to “play the game.” From the 8-bit “Game Over” text flashing on-screen to the dancers wielding controllers, Kendrick turned the performance into a statement about control, rebellion, and breaking free from the system. The Squid Game influence was unmistakable—just like in the series, the rules are rigged, but Kendrick made it clear: he’s playing his own game.

And in a political climate where Trump is calling for the “termination” of DEI programs, Kendrick’s performance felt like direct resistance. A reminder that hip-hop is built on defiance, on truth-telling, on pushing back against a system designed to exclude. As some politicians try to erase diversity initiatives and roll back progress, Kendrick stood centre stage proving why representation isn’t a “trend”—it’s the culture.

Then there was Serena Williams, mid-performance, Crip Walking in A Ma Maniére x Converse Chuck 70s—a full-circle moment from the move she was once criticised for at Wimbledon, now immortalised on the biggest entertainment stage in the world. And the fact that Serena—Drake’s ex—was dancing just as Not Like Us shook the stadium? A subtle but undeniable moment in Kendrick and Drake’s ongoing beef.

And when Not Like Us hit? That wasn’t just a song—it was a power move. Hip-hop doesn’t just belong on this stage. It owns it.

A halftime show that won’t just be remembered. It’ll be studied.